ALAN WATT    BLURB (i.e. Educational Talk):

"DON'T DRIVE - BEHAVE - BEEHIVE

(OR)

HITCHHIKER'S GUIDE TO

BEHAVIOUR MODIFICATION"

May 10, 2007

Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt – May 10, 2007 (Exempting Music and Literary Quotes)

WWW.CUTTINGTHROUGHTHEMATRIX.COM

www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu

Hi folks.  I'm Alan Watt and this is cuttingthroughthematrix.com and alanwattsentientsentinel.eu on May 10th, 2007.

Tonight, I'm going to read a little bit from a magazine called, "The Wilson Quarterly."  This is from the Spring 2007 edition. It has to do also with the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.  On the front page here it's called, "The Climate Engineers." 

I should say, first of all, this magazine is published internationally. This is for the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, D.C.  This article is written by James R. Fleming.  I think it also mentions in here of his different affiliations. Those are interesting to look up, always. The affiliations tell you an awful lot about who's who and who's writing what. 

James R. Fleming, the author of this particular article, is a public policy scholar. He's a “public policy scholar,” interesting, at the Wilson Center and holder of the American Association for the Advancement of Science’s Roger Revelle Fellowship in Global Environmental Stewardship, he’s a professor of science, technology, and society at Colby College, in Waterville, Maine. It gives you a list of some of his books.  It's written by one of THEM, you know, “those guys”—those guys "in the know" on the big CON that's going on, and so they can't give obviously anything near a fair description.  This article is written almost in a British fashion, where they'll give you little bits of facts mixed with almost comedy and alarm together, which leaves the reader in a limbo land, where the fear gets into you.  You'll think, “My God! There's a bunch of crazy people running this particular system!” which intensifies the fear.  They also give you the disinformation to do with it; in this case, it's global warming.

This article says:

"The Climate Engineers." 

             "As alarm over global warming spreads, a radical idea is gaining momentum.  Forget cuts in greenhouse-gas emissions, some scientists argue. Find a technological fix. Bounce sunlight back into space by pumping reflective nanoparticles into the atmosphere. Launch mirrors into orbit around the earth. Create a “planetary thermostat.” But what sounds like science fiction is actually an old story.  For more than a century, scientists, soldiers, and charlatans have hatched schemes to manipulate the weather and climate. Like them, today’s aspiring climate engineers wildly exaggerate what is possible, and they scarcely consider political, military, and ethical implications of attempting to manage the world’s climate—with potential consequences far greater than any their predecessors were ever likely to face."

Alan:  My little comment there is: That's how they would present that in Britain, so it doesn't pooh-pooh any evidence against the global warming theory. It doesn't mention, to start off, that we go through all these different cycles continuously: mini-ice ages, mini-global warming ages, back and forth, and some larger ones.  Since this is supposedly a fairly new study in history, since it didn't supposedly take such a test before and accurate records in the late past, how much of the data can even be counted on as reliable?  It doesn't mention that part, so the debate is over. This begins with the debate on global warming being over and that the facts are real; and that's how it's put into your mind.

"Beyond the security checkpoint at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Ames Research Center at the southern end of San Francisco Bay, a small group gathered in November for a conference on the innocuous topic of “managing solar radiation.” The real subject was much bigger: how to save the planet from the effects of global warming."

Alan:  Again, the debate is over.  It’s not, “Is there global warming?,” but, “The debate is over.”

"There was little talk among the two dozen scientists and other specialists about carbon taxes, alternative energy sources, or the other usual remedies."

Alan:  “Remedies.”  Once again, that's sunk again as it was supposed to be, remedies.

"Many of the scientists were impatient with such schemes. Some were simply contemptuous of calls for international cooperation and the policies and lifestyle changes needed to curb greenhouse-gas emissions; others had concluded that the world’s politicians and bureaucrats are not up to the job of agreeing on such reforms or that global warming will come more rapidly, and with more catastrophic consequences, than many models predict. Now, they believe, it is time to consider radical measures: a technological quick fix for global warming.

             "Mitigation is not happening and is not going to happen,” physicist Lowell Wood declared at the NASA conference. Wood, the star of the gathering, spent four decades at the University of California’s Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, where he served as one of the Pentagon’s chief weapon designers and threat analysts."

Alan:  You can trust this guy to tell you the truth (from the Pentagon).

"(He reportedly enjoys the “Dr. Evil” nickname bestowed by his critics.) The time has come, he said, for “an intelligent elimination of undesired heat from the biosphere by technical ways and means,” which, he asserted, could be achieved for a tiny fraction of the cost of “the bureaucratic suppression of CO₂.” His engineering approach, he boasted, would provide “instant climatic gratification.”

Alan:  This is the guy, remember, who took over from Teller. He was a protégé of Teller, the earlier one; he was Dr. Evil, Part 1. Wood is Part 2.  It was Teller who came up with the whole idea of using metallic particles to intensify or cool, depending on what type they used, the atmosphere for weather warfare purposes; but now they're your saviors.  The war men are now your saviors, remember, and the Pentagon. You can trust the Pentagon.

To continue:

"Wood advanced several ideas to “fix” the earth’s climate, including building up Arctic sea ice to make it function like a planetary air conditioner to “suck heat in from the midlatitude heat bath.” A “surprisingly practical” way of achieving this, he said, would be to use large artillery pieces to shoot as much as a million tons of highly reflective sulfate aerosols or specially engineered nanoparticles into the Arctic stratosphere to deflect the sun’s rays."

Alan:  Here they are, as we say, “down on Earth,” trying to eliminate your cars because of all the different sulfur emissions; but they want to spray it above your heads to save you, huh?

             "Delivering up to a million tons of material via artillery would require a constant bombardment—basically declaring war on the stratosphere. Alternatively, a fleet of B-747 “crop dusters” could deliver the particles by flying continuously around the Arctic Circle. Or a 25-kilometer-long sky hose could be tethered to a military superblimp high above the planet’s surface to pump reflective particles into the atmosphere."

Alan:  We're already being sprayed and we have been for years, so this whole story is a sideline for a different purpose. Remember, quite a few years ago, there was a book came out called, "<