April 23, 2008 (#105)
ALAN WATT
“CUTTING THROUGH THE MATRIX”
LIVE ON RBN

Title Copyright Alan Watt April 23, 2008:

“THE NEW AUTISM
AIN’T WHAT IT USED TO BE –
COMPARATIVE STUDIES WITHIN AMISH COMMUNITY”
© Alan Watt April 23, 2008

Title & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - April 23, 2008 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes and Callers' Comments) 

WWW.CUTTINGTHROUGHTHEMATRIX.COM

www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu

"Code of Silence" by Bruce Springsteen

There's a code of silence that we don't dare speak
There's a wall between us and a river so deep
And we keep pretending that there's nothing wrong
But there's a code of silence and it can't go on

Is the truth so elusive, so elusive you see
that it ain't enough baby
To bridge the distance between you and me
There's a list of grievance 100 miles long
There's a code of silence and it can't go on

Well you walk with your eyes open
But your lips they remain sealed
While the promises we made are broken
Beneath the truth we fear to reveal
Now I need to know now darlin'
I need to know what's goin' on so c'mon

Hi folks. I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on the 23^rd of April 2008. There are so many things happening in the world of control freaks you can’t keep up with them and on Friday I’m going to talk about a new survey that’s going to be done across Britain, where the government is doing 500,000 surveys door-to-door of families and literally going into every aspect of their lives including their sex lives. The Department of Government Statistics, you know the big department that George Orwell talked about.

For newcomers, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com website and download previous shows until your heart’s content and try to fill in all the blank spots that begin to make sense as to this particular agenda we’re living through which we call life and go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu.  Download the transcripts in e various tongues of Europe and print them up and pass them around to your friends.

Now I’ve been talking about this agenda for years and then when each part happens to come into being, for me it’s depressing because it’s like déjà vu, it’s boring, you know what the whole agenda is, and here you are, talking about what’s coming with every step and sure enough it happens and people are always stunned when things happen. They can’t believe it’s actually happening, but for people like myself and for others, who have woken up, it’s very boring because now it’s the next part and the next part that you’re off on to and you know what’s coming down the pike and you know how hard it is to get across to the general public, who still live in la-la land and in Disneyland and in the land of the six o’clock news.

I’ve talked about the psychopaths at the top, the big elite club of the military-industrial complex, those families that own the cartels across the world. They own the governments across the world. They often participate in their own governments before they go back into top CEO positions; and when you follow the individuals’ lives, it’s quite interesting. It’s like Dick Cheney, the man who managed to skip all wars when everyone else was getting called up because he had the right connections, who ends up in charge of a country and the country’s military at one point.  Just like Huxley used to salivate over the thought of Tavistock sticking wires into the brains of people.

Here’s an article about Cheney. It was on Yahoo News, in fact, this particular article, Mark Thompson from Washington, April 19^th.  I’ll read about this article, I’ll read from it to show you what kind of things turn on Mr. Cheney and the military-industrial complex. Back with more after these messages.

Hi folks. I’m Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through the Matrix, this big illusion that we’ve been taught is actually life, and I’m reading an article from Mark Thompson from Washington. I was on Yahoo News a little while ago. It’s also in Time as well, I think Time Magazine.

“The Defense Advanced Research Project Agency, that secretive band of Pentagon geeks that searches obsessively for the next big thing in the technology of warfare, is 50 years old. To celebrate, DARPA invited Vice President Dick Cheney, a former Defense Secretary well aware of the Agency's capabilities, to help blow out the candles.”

Alan:  They love blowing things out or up. 

"This agency brought forth the Saturn 5 rocket, surveillance satellites…”

Alan:  That’s for all that’s coming down now.

“…the Internet, stealth technology, guided munitions, unmanned aerial vehicles, night vision and the body armor that's in use today," Cheney told 1,700 DARPA workers and friends who gathered at a Washington hotel to mark the occasion. "Thank heaven for DARPA."

Alan:  Well, you see their heaven of course is our hell and eventually some of us start to figure this out.

“Created in the panicky wake of the Soviets' launching of Sputnik, the world's first satellite, DARPA's mission, Cheney said, is "to make sure that America is never again caught off guard." So, the Agency does the basic research that may be decades away from battlefield applications. It doesn't develop new weapons, as much as it pioneers the technologies that will make tomorrow's weapons better.

So what's hot at DARPA right now? Bugs. The creepy, crawly flying kind. The Agency's Microsystems Technology Office is hard at work on HI-MEMS (Hybrid Insect Micro-Electro-Mechanical System), raising real insects filled with electronic circuitry, which could be guided using GPS technology to specific targets via electrical impulses sent to their muscles. These half-bug, half-chip creations — DARPA calls them "insect cyborgs" — would be ideal for surveillance missions, the agency says in a brief description on its website.

Scientist Amit Lal and his team insert mechanical components into baby bugs during "the caterpillar and the pupae stages," which would then allow the adult bugs to be deployed to do the Pentagon's bidding. "The HI-MEMS program is aimed at developing tightly coupled machine-insect interfaces by placing micro-mechanical systems inside the insects during the early stages of metamorphosis," DARPA says. "Since a majority of the tissue development in insects occurs in the later stages of metamorphosis, the renewed tissue growth around the MEMS will tend to heal, and form a reliable and stable tissue-machine interface." Such bugs "could carry one or more sensors, such as a microphone or a gas sensor, to relay back information gathered from the target destination."

Alan:  That’s where your tax money is going – high-tech to please the machinations of the military-industrial complex and all the psychopaths at the top. You can’t feed the world. You can’t have a stable economy. You can’t help those who deserve help, but you can create billions for this kind of research into creating monsters which will one day be set loose on the public. They can assassinate people obviously with such bugs. If they can guide a mosquito or whatever they want to particular target and the person drops dead, well, who’s going to do a post-mortem and worry about that? The big boys will just stand around and whistle in the wind, the same way as they do with the aerial spraying. They don’t have to answer you at all and we’ll all think it’s all just a matter of coincidence, but that’s what your money is working on.

In some science fiction movies, they’ve shown you, and I think there’s one that Tom Cruise was in, where they had a condition called “pre-arrest,” where these creatures that were hooked up to electronic equipment could predict who was going to commit a crime or could possibly commit a crime and they’d come in and arrest you. When they were sweeping through looking for their suspects, they released millions of little bugs and spiders that went up stairways and under doorways and through rooms and so on, and sent all the data back to their masters. That movie was put out years ago and here they are telling you for the first time they’re actually working on such things.

The reason these writers for sci-fi came up with this kind of idea is because they’re in on the know and they give us predictive programming, and one day you’ll be used to having armies of spiders coming flooding under your door and checking through everything that you’re doing and it will all be quite natural.

Now here’s another article to talk about because Aldous Huxley talked about powerful groups of very wealthy men in combination could take over the entire planet with scientific technology and very good communications used between them; and that’s what they’ve done basically. They’ve taken over your food supply, a few cartels, which probably are all one at the top, and through massive propaganda and massive lobbying of all governments they’ve got us all in this GMO food stuff; and yet it’s a completely different reality from all the propaganda.

This article here is from Green Living and it came from a newspaper called The Independent. Green Living is the article and it says here – there’s an awful lot of stuff on here.

“Exposed: The Great GM Crops Myth.

Major new study shows that modified soya produces 10 per cent less food than its conventional equivalent.

By Andrew Fox

Last week the biggest study of its kind ever conducted - the International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology for Development - concluded that GM was not the answer to world hunger. Genetic modification actually cuts the productivity of crops, an authoritative new study shows, undermining repeated claims that a switch to the controversial technology is needed to solve the growing world food crisis. The study - carried out over the past three years at the University of Kansas in the US grain belt - has found that GM soya produces about 10 per cent less food than its conventional equivalent, contradicting assertions by advocates of the technology that it increases yields.

Professor Barney Gordon, of the university's department of agronomy, said he started the research - reported in the journal Better Crops - because many farmers who had changed over to the GM crop had "noticed that yields are not as high as expected even under optimal conditions". He added: "People were asking the question 'how come I don't get as high a yield as I used to?'"

He grew a Monsanto GM soybean and an almost identical conventional variety in the same field. The modified crop produced only 70 bushels of grain per acre, compared with 77 bushels from the non-GM one. The GM crop - engineered to resist Monsanto's own weed killer, Roundup - recovered only when he added extra manganese, leading to suggestions that the modification hindered the crop's take-up of the essential element from the soil. Even with the addition it brought the GM soya's yield to equal that of the conventional one, rather than surpassing it.

The new study confirms earlier research at the University of Nebraska, which found that another Monsanto GM soya produced 6 per cent less than its closest conventional relative, and 11 per cent less than the best non-GM soya available. The Nebraska study suggested that two factors are at work. First, it takes time to modify a plant and, while this is being done, better conventional ones are being developed. This is acknowledged even by the fervently pro-GM US Department of Agriculture, which has admitted that the time lag could lead to a "decrease" in yields.

But the fact that GM crops did worse than their near-identical non-GM counterparts suggest that a second factor is also at work, and that the very process of modification depresses productivity. The new Kansas study both confirms this and suggests how it is happening. A similar situation seems to have happened with GM cotton in the US, where the total US crop declined even as GM technology took over. Monsanto said yesterday that it was surprised by the extent of the decline found by the Kansas study, but not by the fact that the yields had dropped. It said that the soya had not been engineered to increase yields, and that it was now developing one that would.”

Alan:  Well that was part of their drumbeat before, wasn’t it? – that it would surpass the old crops.

“Critics doubt whether the company will achieve this, saying that it requires more complex modification. And Lester Brown, president of the Earth Policy Institute in Washington  and who was one of the first to predict the current food crisis  said that the physiology of plants was now reaching the limits of the productivity that could be achieved. A former champion crop grower himself, he drew the comparison with human runners. Since Roger Bannister ran the first four-minute mile more than 50 years ago, the best time has improved only modestly. "Despite all the advances in training, no one contemplates a three-minute mile."

Last week the biggest study of its kind ever conducted - the International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology for Development - concluded that GM was not the answer to world hunger. Professor Bob Watson, the director of the study and chief scientist at the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, when asked if GM could solve world hunger, said: "The simple answer is no."

Alan:  There you have it. After all of the hullabaloo and the secrecy to do with the GMO foods and it really was done all in secrecy with secret deals done with the Canadian government from these companies to the government and using the Canadian public as the guinea pigs for this stuff, they’re now concluding that they produce less crops. What was the purpose at all? What was the purpose? There’s always one or two or three main purposes they could achieve. They don’t do this for fun and not just for profit. It’s also the fact it alters human behavior, I’m sure of that. It certainly makes us sicker. Back with more after the following messages.

Hi folks. I’m Alan Watt Cutting Through the Matrix and just pointing out how we live in so many illusions – illusions which are broadcast into our minds through massive marketing and good propaganda, something that the big companies have lots of around, really, propaganda backed up with millions of dollars to push it across. Advertising can make you believe anything and these characters also lobby your own governments to make sure that their product will be a winner, and there’s nothing better than getting laws passed that people must use your product. What a good sweet deal that is, isn’t it?  You create a product and get governments to pass laws that everyone must use your product.

Now I think we’ve got some callers on the line. It’s not from the last show, is it? Travis from Texas. There’s no callers. I thought not. They’re from the previous show.

Now here’s an article which is important to do with autism, something that has been skyrocketing over the last 25 years or so, and it’s called:

“The Age of Autism: The Amish Anomaly.

By Dan Olmsted, United Press International

LANCASTER, Pa., April 18 -- Part 1 of 2. Where are the autistic Amish? Here in Lancaster County, heart of Pennsylvania Dutch country, there should be well over 100 with some form of the disorder. I have come here to find them, but so far my mission has failed, and the very few I have identified raise some very interesting questions about some widely held views on autism. The mainstream scientific consensus says autism is a complex genetic disorder, one that has been around for millennia at roughly the same prevalence. That prevalence is now considered to be 1 in every 166 children born in the United States.”

Alan:  That’s amazing isn’t it? It’s crept up to that.

“Applying that model to Lancaster County, there ought to be 130 Amish men, women and children here with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Well over 100, in rough terms. Typically, half would harbor milder variants such as Asperger's Disorder or the catch-all Pervasive Development Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified -- PDD-NOS for short. So let's drop those from our calculation, even though "mild" is a relative term when it comes to autism.

That means upwards of 50 Amish people of all ages should be living in Lancaster County with full-syndrome autism, the "classic autism" first described in 1943 by child psychiatrist Leo Kanner at John Hopkins University. The full-syndrome disorder is hard to miss, characterized by "markedly abnormal or impaired development in social interaction and communication and a markedly restricted repertoire of activities and interests," according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.

Why bother looking for them among the Amish? Because they could hold clues to the cause of autism. The first half-dozen articles in this ongoing series on the roots and rise of autism examined the initial studies and early accounts of the disorder, first identified by Kanner among 11 U.S. children born starting in 1931. Kanner wrote that his 19