July 14th, 2008 (#140)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt July 14th, 2008:
"Kyoto Protocol, the Effect's Just Starting,
Balloons on Cattle to Catch Them Farting,
To Wean You from Meat, They'll Make It So,
But You Can Munch on Your Veggies, All GMO"
© Alan Watt July 14th, 2008
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - July 14th, 2008 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
cuttingthroughthematrix.com |
MAILING ADDRESS: |
|
European
site includes all audios & downloadable transcripts in European languages for prspan
style='font-family:Calibri;'> |
|
Information for purchasing of Alan’s books, CDs, DVDs and donations:
Canada and America: PayPal, Cash, personal checks &
for the US, international postal money orders / for Canada, INTERNAL postal money orders
(America: Postal Money orders - Stress the INTERNATIONAL pink one, not the green internal one.)
Outside the Americas: PayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram (Money Gram is cheaper)
PayPal Orders: Use the donate button – and –
Send a separate, additional, accompanying email with the PayPal order.
Those FREE OF computers: write to the address above
Music Intro:
Code of Silence by Bruce Springsteen
There's a code of silence, that we don't dare speak
There's a wall between us, in a river so deep
We keep pretending, that there's nothing wrong.
There's a code of silence, and it can't go on....
Hi folks, this is Alan Watt with Cutting Through the Matrix on Monday, the 14th of July 2008. Newcomers, I ask, look into my archives section on my website, cuttingthroughthematrix.com and download as many of the talks I've given over the years as possible, because within those talks you'll find a wealth of information, connecting a lot of dots down through time, right up to the present day and a lot of documentation as to where you're going as well, and why you're going there. Also look into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu and download transcripts which you can print up and pass around, in the various tongues of Europe.
We are certainly on a roll into this Brave New World. And it is a Brave New World, a term coined thousands of years ago by a Greek philosopher, and then adapted by Huxley for his book, Brave New World, back in the 1930s. A World they knew in the thirties they'd bring in of completely altered humans, trans-humans, that would accept their existence, as natural phenomena. Everything becomes natural over a very short period of time, we adapt so quickly to everything. And the biggest part of this whole agenda into a Brave New World, is simply conditioning the public to accept it. Step by step, from old institutions such as the family, which had to be destroyed through various means, and then leading us into a system where we think we're free individualistically, but no one really is an individual anymore. They're just separate people, in the collective, all doing the same things, and wanting the same things, and talking about the same things. That way you're much easier to control. Families used to often be a problem to tyrants and governments, because they would debate things amongst themselves, and make plans of action and follow them through. The family is simply the remnant of the tribal system, and it had to be eliminated. And every side which you think is left and right, which are all one remember. Remember the eagle has two wings, a left wing and a right wing that is joined at the body, and the body is always hidden behind a shield. That's the ones who rule both sides. So by using the dialectical techniques, people choose one side or the other, and they don't know they're working towards the same goal. You end up on the same road. And the left and the right wing knew, a long, long time ago, through eugenics and through the dissolution of the family unit, they'd bring the two systems together. The Sovietized system and what was called the capitalist type West system. And as Lenin predicted, they'd merge together in seventy years or so. Not quite capitalist and not quite Communist. It's the Brave New World scenario, because both sides, as I say, agreed from the very beginning, they'd have to create new types of humans, and cull off, or at least let die off, the old man and woman. It's quite amazing that since National Health systems were brought into the world under the guise of helping the people, always by top eugenicists by the way, as Lenin also said, these services would also become authorities over the public, and begin to dictate to them policies, and over again a learning period of time, of constant propaganda, the public come to accept these services, as authorities. And that's been done. And shortly these services are to be turned on the people, they have their own mandates for inoculations, and right down to eventual euthanasia for certain types, under 'saving the planet.' Back with more after this break.
Hi, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix. Trying to show people, that there's nothing new really going on, we're simply following an old, old business plan. And the reality the people were given was the big con. The reality that little politicians guided the world on your behalf and they were there on your sufferance, basically. When all this time, a super-government already existed, with vast tentacles going around every country. With people at top places in every country, very rich people, foundations with the same agenda, working on population through propaganda, media, and so on, and forming non-governmental organizations, this wonderful myriad of groups that somehow strangely got acceptance by all major governments, even though they don't represent the people. Although that's what they claim they do. They don't represent the people. But then when democracy was given to the public, and it was written about in Britain by Burke and others, they said even then, in the 1700s, that those with the largest groups would have the voice. However, it doesn't work quite like that, since NGOs are pretty well minority groups with thousands of them. But then, how come only certain ones are selected as having a voice and the other ones aren't even heard, or even mentioned? You see the NGOs are part of the Soviet system which is blended with the Western system, as it was intended to do. As the Club of Rome, talked about, as the Reece commission talked about with Senator Dodd; the whole point was to merge with the Soviet system. Soviet means rule by councils, and the NGO system was alive and well all through the Soviet era, pretending to speak on behalf of each part of society. The only difference being was that the Politburo openly put the leader for that NGO. And the NGO group would say, we demand that the government pass this law, for this reason, and the government was only so happy to do so. So this is how the game worked, and it works exactly the same way in the West. Otherwise, in a true democracy, every citizen would get an invitation to go to the big global meetings that would affect them. Every one of these global meetings, to do with environment or whatever else they're using, and the environment is to be the big stick according to the Club of Rome. They were the guys who dreamed up this whole idea of Global Warming, and man is the problem. The same old eugenicists funding them, the big foundations. And they turn up, the NGOs turn up at the global meetings, in very exotic places across the planet, you couldn't afford to get there. And they have a voice pretending to speak for the people of planet Earth. And as you all know, you all voted to have your rights taken away, obviously, since these people speak for you.
Another little key to the fact that you're already global is the fact that media, always, when it picks a certain subject goes into action across the planet, in every newspaper, at the same time, on the same topics, with different writers. And this from the BBC on the big new religion, you know this greening religion, going with the Green Party as well, no doubt. The same thing that Mr. Gorbachev talked about creating, a form of Earth worship, that's what he meant by it. And like all forms of religion, it has its high priests who are very holy people, closer to their deity, then we little peasants could ever be. The BBC news, on Friday, the 6th of January, 2006, by Chris Rapley
Earth is too crowded for Utopia
The global population is higher than the Earth can sustain, argues the Director of the British Antarctic Survey in the first of a series of environmental opinion pieces on the BBC News website entitled The Green Room. (Alan: You know this is ongoing now. Years ago, I said, when all this started, the hardest thing to do will be to hold on to your sanity as we go through the changes you're going to experience, if you’re conscious. Those living in the bliss of ignorance, won't notice anything, they'll just draft into it, quite like a mosquito coming through the door, and blown in by the wind.) Solving environmental problems such as climate change is going to be impossible without tackling the issue, he says. (A: This is a pure propaganda piece you see.)
Ten thousand delegates attended the recent Montreal Summit on the control of carbon emissions "beyond Kyoto".
(A: You see they put something on the books. They give you a vague idea of something going on called Kyoto, about environment, and once it's on the books, they expand it. That's how all laws work. This is beyond Kyoto.)
That's a lot of people! The conference organization must have been daunting; and just imagine arranging the hotel accommodation and restaurant facilities and dealing with the additional human-generated waste. (A: This is a little bit of humor, before they give you the propaganda.)
Imagine the carbon and nitrogen emissions from the associated air travel!
The 40 or more decisions made were announced as an historic success.
Supposing this proves to be so, will it be sufficient to secure an acceptable quality of life for the generations to come?
(A: Then they go into their propaganda here. It's a beautiful way it's written here, as though they're attacking it and laughing at it, as not being hard enough. And then they come out with what they should be doing.)
What about the myriad other planetary-scale human impacts - for example on land cover, the water cycle, the health of ecosystems, and biodiversity?
What about our release of other chemicals into the environment?
What about our massive transport and mixing of biological material worldwide, and our unsustainable consumption of resources?
(A: All these little buzz words)
All of these effects interconnect and add up to the collective "footprint" of humankind on our planet's life support systems.
The consequences extend to the ends of the Earth – recall the hole in the ozone layer over the Antarctic (A: which only NASA could see) – and each is as difficult to predict and as challenging to deal with as the link between carbon emissions and climate.
It would surely be impractical and almost certainly ineffective to assemble 10,000 delegates to address each one of these issues, and especially to do so in the necessary "joined up" way?
And in particular, what about the net 76 million annual rise in the world's population, (A: Now all these statistics, you see, most folks don't even ask or question anything, they just look at it, and believe them, as they pull figures out of the ether and repeat them)which currently stands at about 6.5 billion - more than twice what it was in 1960 - and which is heading towards eight billion or so by mid-century?
That's an annual increase 7,500 (A: they love this nonsense)times the number of delegates in Montreal.