Sept. 29, 2008  (#173)

 

Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:

Poem Copyright Alan Watt Sept. 29, 2008:

"Global Interdependence will Erase Each Border,
The Rich Men Give a New Financial Order,
A Global Monetary Authority is the Mantra Cry,
And After the Panic the People will Sigh
With Relief, Debt Binds with Such Heavy Chains,
A New System Born, Feel the New Labour Pains"
© Alan Watt Sept. 29, 2008

 

Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Sept. 29, 2008 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)

 

www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com                       www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu

 

 

"Code of Silence" by Bruce Springsteen
 
There's a code of silence that we don't dare speak
There's a wall between us and a river so deep
And we keep pretending that there's nothing wrong
But there's a code of silence and it can't go on
 
Is the truth so elusive, so elusive as you can see
that it ain't enough baby
To bridge the distance between you and me
There's a list of grievance 100 miles long
There's a code of silence and it can't go on

 

Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on the 29th of September, 2008.  Newcomers go in to www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site and you can download as many of the talks I’ve given in the past for free.  You can also pass them around to your friends when you burn them on disc.  Also look in to www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts you can print up of these talks I’ve given and pass them around to your friends.  Remember too, if you see my stuff advertised on other web sites, it’s illegal if they’re selling it on their web sites.  Cuttingthroughthematrix.com is the only authorized web site you can find them on… at least legally. 

 

Now, we’ve all seen what’s happening with this financial chaos that’s been brought on.  It wasn’t a sudden thing that happened.  Nothing happens in the financial sector suddenly.  It takes YEARS to get to this stage.  Years of inflation and years of overpricing everything, especially the housing market.  It’s been done intentionally.  Years ago when they set up, even at the United Nations, they talked about the TIME WHEN THEY WOULD BRING IN A NEW BANKING SYSTEM, a new global authority on banking.  The fist step to it was the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, but it’s not enough.  They want to regulate all markets and all commercial and banking interests as well.  This is part of the whole agenda that we’re living through right now. 

 

Every hundred years or so the bankers plunder the populace.  The ALLOW you to build up equity and property and they collapse it and steal it from you.  That’s tradition by the banking industry down through the ages.  For those who lived their lives without being conscious of what’s really going on and who take everything that’s going on around them as normal - and it is normal because you’re born in to it and everyone else accepts everything in the system - go in to the history of banking and look at how it originated in the Western world.  Look at the goldsmiths and how they used to bring in the gold from people and hand out scrip, promises to pay.  That’s how it started.  Then the Knights Templars got in the act and they became the world’s biggest banking institution, an INTERNATIONAL banking institution.  They did the same thing.  You could deposit your gold in a bank - one of their banks - in England, travel all the way to the Middle-East, and take it out again, get gold back again when you cashed it in, in the Holy Land.  They acquired real estate ALL over Europe.  It was getting to the stage, in fact, they almost OWNED the whole of Europe during the Crusades.  Because knights were being killed off and they made it a custom for their widows to hand over everything, on their death, TO the Knights Templars association.  It was a form, it was a sort of microcosm of a world government running commerce, industry and warfare at the same time.  Nothing’s really, really changed. 

 

There’s an article I’m going to read shortly from the United Nations.  This is a follow up to this financial situation as the banks merge and go under.  As I say, it was planned this way.  I talked about this, years ago.  I’ll be back with more after this break.

 

Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix.  I’m discussing this banking crisis and trying to let the listeners know that nothing happens suddenly in this big economic system.  For most of the public, they’re unaware that so much has happened in the last 20 years especially to do with banking and trade and so on, due to big international agreements generally spearheaded by the United Nations.  Remember, the United Nations, when it was set up, had mandates to take over, basically, all the functions of national governments and be a WORLD government.  It still is.  That’s its purpose.  That’s why it was set up. 

 

Back in the 90s, I think it was, in France, every country that signed on to the United Nations signed agreements there to do with free trade.  That was the precursor to the signing of the GATT Treaty, but it was a separate part.  It was to do with foreign investment in countries, where they opened the door for foreign investment into every country of the West.  Not only opened the door to foreign investment but they said that the LAWS of those countries COULD NOT STOP corporations coming in, or even factories coming in and paying minimum wage as they would back in their own country.  In other words, someone from China could open up a factory, if they wanted to, and pay them Chinese wages and if the government of your country said, no, we have a minimum wage standard of $7, $8, or whatever it is, then that country could then sue your country and they were guaranteed to win millions before they’d even set up a stake in the ground.  That’s happened.  This is all to TIE the countries together internationally.  That’s part of what they mean by global interdependence. 

 

No member of the public was allowed IN to hear the proceeding of those meetings.  That’s how this democracy really works.  I think one Canadian agency was allowed to go in and voice some concerns and this particular agency that supposedly spoke for Canada - this NGO group - came out and said all they discussed was that this new trade organization for the world, an investment organization, should pay their workers fair wages.  That’s no kidding. 

 

The general public don’t know what’s going on.  They don’t know that out of this crisis is to come a NEW financial type of system.  We’re being trained, step by step, IN to this new system.  The public will go along with it because they panic.  They believe the media.  They don’t know anything else except what the media tells them.  It never occurs to them to study the histories of the big organizations that are coming forward with all the suggestions.  They don’t study the United Nations or even the banking system. 

 

The banking system is fraudulent, of course, because money is backed with nothing.  It’s an obligations type deal.  An IOU.  They pass IOUs all around the world.  It’s a DEBT system.  So you have paper money backed with nothing.  GUARANTEED that when they want to pull the plug, it has a domino effect.  Nothing but faith keeps it going.  They could keep this going as long as they wanted to, believe you me, for another hundred years, if they wanted to.  The reason it’s changing now is to train the public into a NEW way of living and a new form of commerce, eventually, will come out of it, in the long run.  It might take years.  In the long run, it’s a new form of commerce and living in to a new society. 

 

This is from the Breitbart.com web site.  It says

 

UN chief calls for 'global leadership' 

 Sep 23, 2008

 

 UN chief Ban Ki-moon on Tuesday stressed the need for "global leadership" as he pressed world leaders not to pursue narrow national interests in the face of hard economic times.

 

"I see a danger of nations looking more inward, rather than toward a shared future," he said at the opening of the UN General Assembly's annual debate.

 

He spoke of a "challenge of global leadership" to tackle the world's worsening financial, energy and food crises.  (Alan:  Now remember too, the deal was for the Department of Agriculture at the United Nations that they eventually will be the ones who distribute the world’s food to each nation.  The purpose would be, not only for control over those countries, but the purpose would be that each country would have to keep its population in check.  It would get a set quota of food and if you went over that population figure, tough cheese for you.  You’d have to reduce your population because you won’t get more food.  It’s to be a big stick.  So financial, energy and food crises, he said.  These are all the areas in which they’re involved at the United Nations.)

 

"We see new centers of power and leadership -- in Asia, Latin America and across the newly developed world," Ban told more than 120 heads of state or government, including Presidents George W. Bush of the United States and Nicolas Sarkozy of France.

 

"In this new world (A:  New world, he says), our challenges are increasingly those of collaboration rather than confrontation," he added.

 

"Nations can no longer protect their interests, or advance the well-being of their people, without the partnership of the rest."  (A:  You see, we’re in a GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP.  We’re INTERdependent, completely tied together.)

 

On the world's current financial crisis, the UN secretary general stressed the need to "restore order to the international financial markets".

 

"We need a new understanding on business ethics and governance (A:  They call it governance, at the United Nations because they don’t believe there’s any governments… and they’re quite correct in that.), with more compassion and less uncritical faith in the 'magic' of markets," the UN boss said.

 

Ban, who has chosen implementation of key poverty reduction goals as a major theme of this year's debate, said he saw "a danger of retreating from the progress we have made, particularly in the realm of development and more equitably sharing the fruits of global growth."  (A:  Well, I wonder who’s sharing the fruits of global growth?)

 

"Global growth has raised billions of people out of poverty. However, if you are among the world's poor, you have never felt poverty so sharply."  

 

He goes on and on about helping Africa and the usual stuff.  They’ve been helping Africa for 500 years… as they plunder it.  Later on in the talk, he actually talks about this NEW system they want to bring in, a new system and a new way of doing trade and banking and all the rest of it.  That’s really what all of this is about. 

 

The people, as I say, have no idea how things really are in the real world.  They think it’s all happening by chance.  This ties in with this.  You’ll hear a lot of people from BIG foundations, big organizations coming forth and calling for the same solutions.  This article here is from Jeffrey Garten.  He’s a member of the Council on Foreign Affairs, the former policy planner for Henry Kissinger and former managing director for Lehman Brothers.  The former manager of Lehman Brothers.  I guess he got out before it went down. 

 

We need a new Global Monetary Authority

September 25, 2008

By Jeffrey Garten

[emphasis added]

 

Even if the US’s massive financial rescue operation succeeds (A:  Which of course, they’re not going to do it right now.  They’re playing it like a big drama and we’re all supposed to shake and be really fearful.), it should be followed by something even more far-reaching – the establishment of a Global Monetary Authority to oversee markets that have become borderless.  (A:  There’s your whole deal, you see.  Most people don’t realize that each nation is based on an economic policy.  The policy SERVES those who rule that country, the dominant minority.  Therefore, all your laws - civic, criminal and so on - all revolve around your economic structures.  If you don’t have a border anymore and no nation and you’re international, you have to have this global monetary authority.  Out of that will come the brand new culture and all the rest of it AND the laws.  He goes on to say…)

 

Washington recognises that the crisis has become global.  (A:  My God, they’re quick.) Hank Paulson, Treasury secretary, has said that foreign banks operating in the US will be eligible for federal assistance and he is urging other nations to fashion their own bail-out programmes. Central banks have also been synchronising injections of funds into markets. These should be steps to a more comprehensive international response designed not just to extinguish the current fires, but to rebuild and maintain the capital markets for the longer term.

 

The current global institutional apparatus is woefully incapable of overseeing the financial system that is evolving. (A:  You see, it’s EVOLVING, it’s changing.)  The International Monetary Fund is irrelevant to this crisis, the Group of Seven leading industrial countries lacks legitimacy in a world where China, Brazil and others are big players, and the Bank for International Settlement has no operational role. The US Federal Reserve is too besieged to act as a global central bank.

 

That vacuum at the centre is dangerous for everyone. The US’s dependence on massive inflows of foreign capital, roughly $3bn (€2bn, £1.6bn) a day, will surely increase now as Uncle Sam acquires $1,000bn in new obligations from current bail-outs. For years to come, Wall Street and Washington will be unable to manage without strong co-operation from other markets.

 

Now, I told people years ago and I’ve repeated it many time since, that as the US finished off its job in the Middle-East, they’ll be pulling the carpet, the rug, from under your feet back home.  You’re watching all of this happen.  You’re living through it.  How do I know this?  Is it because I have a crystal ball?  It’s because, NO, I read their books.  I read the books of the big boys and they tell you what they’re bringing in.  Then you have to use your own common sense and say, how could they make this possible?  How could they bring this in?  Sometimes in their own books, they’ll tell you.  They’ll suggest things that might usher IN the new system.  Part of that, of course, is bringing down the banking system, terrifying the public, getting you to your knees and then, coming out with a solution.  And as you lose your shirt, you’ll breathe a sigh of relief and say, thanks for helping us, take my shoes too.  That’s how it works, you see.  That’s how people are in these particular systems, all the ordinary people, because in reality, you have no power in this system.  It’s not your system.  I’ll be back with more from this particular article from the Financial Times after this break. 

 

Hi folks.  I’m Alan Watt talking about this banking system.  The one that IS and is going and the one that is coming IN and how it’s being done.  The big foundations are in on the act.  The Council on Foreign Relations is in on the act.  The Royal Institute of International Affairs is in on the act.  They’re ALL in on this act to bring in a new system.  It’s part of a phase to change the world and of course they must do it in many different ways, many different spheres of life but they must definitely do it economically as well. 

 

They’ve tied us up together.  We’re so tightly woven, we’re interdependent, as they call it.  One country goes down, the others follow like dominoes.  That’s suppose to be a good thing but if you are looking at it from the other side of the mirror, from the guys who control the planet, it is a good thing… then they own the whole world.  It’s all about ownership, really.  That’s what it’s about.  The world is owned by very, very rich people, not too many of them, but incredibly rich people who KNOW the con games of money since their ancestors developed it and invented it.  They understand how to crash economies and they also understand how to keep the con going as long as they want to.  So it’s now TIME to change the system and they’re going ahead with it.  Making the people fearful, that’s got to be done so that WE will beg them for a solution after we’ve had enough.  Then they always give us the solution that’s not as great as the last one but it’s a bit better than nothing.  Then we go along with it.  They PLUNDER us, as I say, at least once every hundred years.  They’ll let you build up equity and real property and then they steal it from you.  That’s how it happens.  Nothing disappears, it just moves into fewer and fewer hands. 

 

This article here, that I’m reading, goes on to say,

 

Globalization will now also create a clash of philosophies.  Most governments and investors outside the US never shared the American system of cowboy capitalism.  Now they have reason to demand some fundamental changes be made in the way the US manages its financial institutions.  This can happen with a conscious, negotiated modification in the US financial model, or it could result in foreign investors shifting their fund elsewhere. 

 

All of these considerations point to the eventual need for a new Global Monetary Authority(A:  You’re going to hear this said over and over and over, Global Monetary Authority, it’s like ‘weapons of mass destruction’, UNTIL WE GET IT.  They say we’ve got to hear this at least 8 times - in marketing - before we start parroting it ourselves.)  It would set the tone for markets in a way that would not be viscerally opposed to a strong public oversight function with rules for intervention and would return to capital formation the goal of economic growth and development rather that creating for its own sake.  (A:  See, trading for its own sake has kind of gone out of the picture now.)

 

The GMA would be a reinsurer or discounter for certain obligations held by central banks.  It would scrutinize the regulatory activity of national authorities with more teeth than the IMF has and oversee the implementation of a limited number of global regulations.  It would monitor global risks and establish an effective early warning system with more clout to sound alarms than the BIS has. 

 

Now, that also means, too, that they’re going to oversee ALL business.  That’s a big part of it.  If you go back in to their books, even with those of HG Wells.  He was a propagandist FOR this group that spearheaded the globalization system.  Wells said that the world was just too untidy with people leaving school and trying to make their way for themselves in a selfish manner.  They wanted to bring in a world of SERVICE and he said that eventually they’ll bring in an organized, ordered world.  An ordered world, where you couldn’t just start a business up out of thin air from your own idea, your own head, you’d have to be GIVEN and TOLD what to start up IF you were allowed to start up anything.  And they would eventually cut down ALL competition.  Competition is to be eliminated, eventually, in the long run.  Once again, the big, international corporations will flourish and everyone else will go down the tubes.  That’s always been the agenda and if you look at the countries of Europe and especially Britain, from the days of even before Margaret Thatcher, but onwards definitely, they put most of the small business OUT and UNDER because ¾ of their day was spent filling in forms for government.  So much red tape it literally put them out and put them under.  The big, international corporations sailed through because they have banks of lawyers to deal with all the government regulations and they also don’t have to pay taxes for maybe 20 years… if ever at all. 

 

That’s the reality of the worldIt’s a very different one that the one portrayed to us.  We do want to feel safe and secure.  We want to believe the media version of things… but it’s all bogus.  It’s not the real world at all.  You have to look into all the agreements, especially all the treaties that have been signed BY your countries over the last 50, at least 50 years.  You got to look in to them.  You’ve got look at how they united Europe, how long it took them, from 1948 onwards in to the 90s, before the ADMITTED, once it was all completed, THAT IT WAS DONE IN SECRECY AND THAT THE PUBLIC WERE NOT TO BE TOLD UNTIL IT WAS OVER AND DONE AND COMPLETELY UP AND RUNNING.  That’s how democracy really works. 

 

You’ve got to look at the writings of Hitler who wanted a united Europe and the writings of Winston Churchill and his personal secretary, Fringes of Power.  In there, Winston Churchill also wanted a united Europe.  He said, our long dream of a united Europe will come out of this war and is the best thing that ever happened.  A very different world from the one that we’re taught in school.  Very, very different, indeed.  It’s on a rollercoaster.  You think about that.  I was thinking about that today, this rollercoaster of what appears to be bizarro-ness.  I call it bizarro-ness, as they spend money like it’s coming out of fountains… for wars… while they’re sinking back home.  I’ll be back with more after this break. 

 

Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and I’ve been discussing some of the new banking system that’s coming in.  This new authority they want to bring in, a global authority, which truly is the end of nationalism.  It’s just another nail in the coffin to make sure we get the message.  Most of the public will breathe a sigh of relief when a new system is brought in.  Then, they’ll go back to play for a while as they start to lose more and more freedoms and rights.  One day, they’ll wake up with no food and probably no home and then they’ll riot.  That’s what the Department of Defence and the US military’s own documentation have stated.  There’s going to be 30-40 years of rioting taking place, they just don’t tell you why.  But Joe and Jane average that likes to play, will dismiss that out of hand and say that will never happen, as they will with everything else that ever happens in their lifetime.  COMPLETE DENIAL.

 

Look at the money as all of this is going on, as the banks supposedly merge and go down and all the rest of it, as all this is going on, the US is spending BILLIONS, just about every day or two with orders for new equipment and new technology and all the rest of it.  It’s just astounding to watch it.  They’re not worried.  They don’t seem to be worried about lack of funds.  I was looking at an article the other day there on these new miniature MAVs, they call them.  They’re little flying robots which they say are going to take off very shortly.  It’s for urban warfare.  It’s for monitoring the urban landscape.  Because you know yourself, obviously, everything’s going to be terrorism from now on. 

 

Once there are no more countries, no more nations to fight, there’ll have to be terrorism to fight, which will be everywhere.  From their point of view, they’re quite correct because the general population have had war declared on them for a long time, they just didn’t know it.  If you still hold old-fashioned values and old ideas about rights and so on, you technically are a terrorist.  The new system coming in does not believe that the average person is supposed to have rights.  YOU’RE SUPPOSED TO SERVE THE WORLD STATE.  BE A SERVANT TO IT.  Which is a nice term for a slave, really. 

 

Eventually, after al the banks go under, not just this time but in the time to come too - maybe in another 4 or 5 years as we get used to them going - they’ll bring in a CREDIT system.  A new credit system, as Bertrand Russell stated, and you’ll have the government dishing out credits to every individual IF YOU’RE WELL BEHAVED.  If you’re NOT well behaved, and you’re ANTI-SOCIAL, then they will simply withhold your credits and you can’t pay your rent.  In the new system, remember, there’s to be no private property.  Think about that when you watch all these people losing their homes.  NOT just in the US and Canada but across Europe as well and everywhere else.  They’re collapsing the housing markets everywhere.  Part of the agenda.  It’s amazing how everything that happens, as I say, just AMAZING how it always falls in line with the written and published agenda.  It’s astonishing.  Utterly astonishing.  Coincidence after coincidence. 

 

Now, this morning, I watched them start to spray the skies.  The day started off as actually sunny with a kind of BLUE color there that I vaguely remember from years gone by.  Then they started spraying and then the mush came overhead as they built these into this undefined, horizon-to-horizon cloud.  Then you can actually feel, after a few hours, almost a wheeze coming on because this stuff’s coming down to the ground.  I’ve also stated that this stuff is reaching saturation point in the ground, in the earth itself.  A few years ago I mentioned that the birds were declining.  I told you, you must use your own observations.  Don’t wait for the media or press to tell you because they’ll tell you something eventually with a spin on it.  Sure enough, the birds are declining.  You don’t HEAR the big chorus of birds at dawn.  You don’t HEAR the chorus of birds at sundown as they all settle in for the night.  You just don’t hear that anymore.  You’re lucky if you SEE a bird.  I can walk through the forest here and it’s pretty quiet.  Maybe one or two birds on the whole journey.  They’re killing them off.  I’ve also got moles, ground moles coming up out of the ground, frequently now, and dying.  Now, this stuff goes in to the soil with the rain, with the dew as well, it brings it right down to the ground level itself.  So this mole is living in a highly toxic environment, a more condensed form of the chemicals in the spray than we’re getting perhaps, and it’s killing them off.  Birds and moles and other things too are dying.  Well, here’s the media spin.  Now they’ve actually admitted the birds are declining.  It’s quite funny, really, the way they spin it.  They always spin it to blame the public.  This is from the BBC News. 

 

World's common birds 'declining' 

By Mark Kinver

Science and environment reporter, BBC News 

Monday, 22 September 2008

[emphasis added]

 

The populations of the world's common birds are declining as a result of continued habitat loss  (A:  See, right off they give you the reason, a reason for it.  It sounds plausible because we’ve been conditioned to believe this is true.  I live in the forest here.  There’s thousands of miles of forest this way.  Thousands.  If I go north, there’s even more… and very few people.  But they’re putting it down to habitat loss.  Well, if it’s a loss somewhere, say in the Amazon, it’s not affecting me up here or the birds up here.  So why are the birds up here dying?  It’s because of the spray.  Because of the spray.), a global assessment has warned.

 

The survey by BirdLife International found that 45% of Europe's common birds had seen numbers fall, as had more than 80% of Australia's wading species.