Alan Watt
"Cutting Through The Matrix" Live On RBN (#240)

CFR's Voracity for a Planned Society:

"Weaving a Plan Around Convention,
Men in Shadows Evaded Detection,
New World Order, No Variety,
Intelligentsia to Rule, Planned Society,
After Riots, Youth, All-Naivety,
Demanding a Just World of Sustainability,
Idealism Used for Good or Harm,
Summed Up in Orwell's 'Animal Farm,'
Old Wise Men Guide Youth to Utopia,
When Regime is In, You Have Dystopia,
Drab Collectivism Demands, in Its Fashion,
You Serve the State for Daily Ration"

Thursday 22nd January 2009

Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt – Jan. 22. 2009 (Exempting Music and Literary Quotes)

www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com                            www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu

"Code of Silence" by Bruce Springsteen

There's a code of silence that we don't dare speak
There's a wall between us and a river so deep
And we keep pretending that there's nothing wrong
But there's a code of silence and it can't go on

 

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is the 22nd of January 2009. 

I always advise newcomers to look into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com and, on the website, you'll find hundreds of talks I've given, over the years, where I've tried to give you a view of history, often history that's been stuck away somewhere, hidden from the general public, and then comes out in an occasional book or periodical, in old dry books. Generally, you have to go through lots and lots of books, very dry books, to find a little sentence or a paragraph that just stuns you; and, if you can keep awake going through them, then it really hits you, otherwise, you'll sleep right through it. I think that's why they write them that way, to be honest with you.

I try to give you the short cuts to seeing a picture, a big picture of, really, a controlled society, a society that, by proof and evidence, from books written by big players of their time, they can show you how mind control of whole populations is nothing new and that there certainly is a group that’s existed, at least on one side, one hemisphere of the planet, that ran the last 100 years and it’s presently running the future we're going into right now, in fact they're up there, negotiating between countries, going round governments and even advising governments as what to do. They've been at this forever and I've been trying to go through some of the history of this particular group that now, blatantly, comes out on television as the CFR, openly; and, most of the public, when they see that, talking to some politician, will think it's some governmental department, the Council on Foreign Relations, but it's not, it's a private organisation and it's the American branch of the Royal Institute of International Affairs; a private organisation.

I've been going through Carroll Quigley's books, Professor Carroll Quigley, who was the historian for this group, for a while, and he went through all of the records, he was a big player himself, in his field; he advised the State Department, he advised Military Departments, he was well up on various topics and he obviously had to have been a member himself, even to get access to the records of this group that, literally, kept the magnitude of their implications in history out of the picture of the general books we get to see. He even wrote about that, how he was astonished at the power they wielded, for a hundred years and right up to the present. At least in his day anyway, that was the 1960s and it's still going yet, because they were in control of all periodicals, they had a lot of the men in politics at high positions. They ran the media completely and they were backed by the big banker families; the big banking families were all on board; and, that's something I'd like to get into, eventually, and go back into time, maybe after tonight's talk.

When we look at what's happening today: we're going into a global society, a global society that was the dream of the founders of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, that was their dream; and, it was a dream so fervent in their minds they didn't stop short of manipulating and creating wars, like the Boer War, to get their way; and, whole nations went to war, because of machinations behind the scenes, by many of their members. That's a hard thing for most people to believe today, but, it's documented, not in conspiracy books, but by professors who were involved in the organisation. Back with more - after this break. 

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix.

I should also mention, before I go on: look into www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts of the talks I've given; and, you can print them up, they're written in the various languages of Europe. You can also look into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com website, see what's for sale there; and, you can also donate to me as well, that keep me going. I won't be around forever; I can assure you of that.  

Getting back to what I was talking about, was some of the histories that have led us up to where we are today. If you don't know these histories, you won't know why things are happening today; and, even with the rioting, that was predicted a long time ago, and is now breaking out all over the place, you can be pretty well guaranteed that there will be leaders who will step in and guide the new youth into the correct corral, once again, of sustainability, a new way of living, a new economic system; and, you'll serve the world state. All under this beautiful utopian guise that we will all be, technically, equal. Remember what equality is, and George Orwell said in Animal Farm: "some are more equal than others" in such utopias. There's always been a dominant minority, as Huxley said, and he said, in the same speech at Berkeley, he said "I presume there always will be”; he saw no reason why it shouldn't be, even in a scientifically-run dictatorship. We're really under that today, because that which runs us today is the science of the mind, science of the masses, which wasn't drummed-up or dreamed-up by Bernays, it was already understood long before him.

There's no doubt about it, those who control the money, control the world; and, Professor Carroll Quigley talked about this, because, after all, the big bankers were funding the particular groups, from Cecil Rhodes, Lord Milner, into the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Round Tables, they were funding what was to be taught in universities. They were dishing out the grants as to where science should go and you've got to understand, science is now dictating our lives to us, as to how we should live and how the future is to be. It's all connected, because it's not evolving out of the imaginations of the general public, as we just drift along through time, it's planned that way.  If you don't understand the present so-called Depression, which we're into, this financial depression, which went against all the rules of economics, because, in the Hidden Persuaders, Vance Packard said that one of the top economists had said that any economist saying the bad news to lose confidence in the people, of investors, was committing suicide. It was tantamount to heresy, he said. Why would a president come out and tell you that this crash that's coming could be worse than 1930s? That was guaranteed to stop everything; and, then, they already had their next man with his regime lined up to walk in and implement the next phase of it. The whole greening agenda, the new economic system, that which I've been talking about here, a new way of living, a new way of living; and you will always wonder who's behind it and everyone else will blame everyone else and they'll never know. 

In Tragedy & Hope, by Carroll Quigley, he talks about the last Depression and you can pretty well put it to the present one as well. He says: 

In the various actions which increase or decrease the supply of money, governments, bankers, and industrialists have not always seen eye to eye. On the whole, in the period up to 1931, bankers, especially the Money Power controlled by the international investment bankers, were able to dominate both business and government. 

Well, that's not news to us, but they pretend they have nothing to do with government, they always will. 

They could dominate business, especially in activities and in areas where industry could not finance its own needs for capital, because investment bankers had the ability to supply or refuse to supply such capital. Thus, Rothschild interests came to dominate many of the railroads of Europe, 

Now, Rothschild, remember, he took over the will and the legacy of running the Cecil Rhodes Foundation, which was set up to bring in a world government, ultimately. So, from the very beginning of this organisation - and I don't think it was the beginning with Cecil Rhodes - the bankers were on board, with this agenda. He says: 

while Morgan 

He already mentioned Morgan, the Morgan family were heavily-involved with the CFR funding it, in all different directions. 

Morgan dominated at least 26,000 miles of American railroads. Such bankers went further than this. In return for flotations of securities of industry, they took seats on the boards of directors of industrial firms, as they had already done on commercial banks, savings banks, insurance firms, and finance companies. From these lesser institutions they funnelled capital to enterprises which yielded control and away from those who resisted. These firms were controlled through interlocking directorships, holding companies, and lesser banks. They engineered amalgamations and generally reduced competition, 

In other words: they were consortiums. 

until by the early twentieth century many activities were so monopolized 

They'd kicked out all competition and stifled it or smothered it. 

that they could raise their non-competitive prices above costs to obtain sufficient profits to become self-financing and were thus able to eliminate the control of bankers. But before that stage was reached a relatively small number of bankers were in positions of immense influence in European and American economic life. 

Now, here's where a famous statement was made, that's been copied many times, by many authors, going into the conspiracy side of it. This is by Professor Carroll Quigley: 

As early as 1909, Walter Rathenau, who was in a position to know (since he had inherited from his father control of the German General Electric Company and held scores of directorships himself), said, 

This is what he said: 

"Three hundred men, all of whom know one another, direct the economic destiny of Europe and choose their successors from among themselves." 

See that was already set up, a long time ago. 

The power of investment bankers over governments rests on a number of factors, of which the most significant, perhaps, is the need of governments to issue short-term treasury bills as well as long-term government bonds. Just as businessmen go to commercial banks for current capital advances to smooth over the discrepancies between their irregular and intermittent incomes and their periodic and persistent outgoes (such as monthly rents, annual mortgage payments, and weekly wages), so a government has to go to merchant bankers (or institutions controlled by them) 

Institutions controlled by them. 

to tide over the shallow places caused by irregular tax receipts. As experts in government bonds, the international bankers not only handled the necessary advances but provided advice to government officials and, on many occasions, placed their own members in official posts for varied periods to deal with special problems. This is so widely accepted even today that in 1961 a Republican investment banker became Secretary of the Treasury in a Democratic Administration in Washington without significant comment from any direction. Naturally, the influence of bankers over governments during the age of financial capitalism (roughly 1850-1931) was not something about which anyone talked freely, but it has been admitted frequently enough by those on the inside, especially in England.  

Even as far back as:  

In 1852 Gladstone, chancellor of the Exchequer, declared, "The hinge of the whole situation was this: the government itself was not to be a substantive power in matters of Finance, but was to leave the Money Power supreme and unquestioned." 

In other words: don't touch it. 

On September 26, 1921, The Financial Time of Finance, but was to leave the Money Power supreme and unquestioned." 

In other words: don't touch it. 

On September 26, 1921, The Financial Times wrote, "Half a dozen men at the top of the Big Five Banks could upset the whole fabric of government finance by refraining from renewing Treasury Bills." In 1924 Sir Drummond Fraser, vice-president of the Institute of Bankers, stated, "The Governor of the Bank of England must be the autocrat who dictates the terms upon which alone the Government can obtain borrowed money."  

In addition to their power over government based on government financing and personal influence, bankers could steer governments in ways they wished them to go by other pressures. Since most government officials felt ignorant of finance, they sought advice from bankers whom they considered to be experts in the field. The history of the last century shows, as we shall see later, that the advice given to governments by bankers, like the advice they gave to industrialists, was consistently good for bankers, but was often disastrous for governments, businessmen, and the people generally. Such advice could be enforced if necessary by manipulation of exchanges, gold flows, discount rates, and even levels of business activity. Thus Morgan dominated Cleveland's second administration by gold withdrawals, and in 1936-1938 French foreign exchange manipulators paralyzed the Popular Front governments. As we shall see, the powers of these international bankers reached their peak in the last decade of their supremacy, 1919-1931, when Montagu Norman and J. P. Morgan dominated not only the financial world but international relations and other matters as well. On November 11th, 1927, the Wall Street Journal called Mr. Norman "the currency dictator of Europe." This was admitted by Mr. Norman himself before the Court of the Bank on March 21st, 1930, and before the Macmillan Committee of the House of Commons five days later.  

They admitted they basically ruled the world. 

On one occasion, just before international financial capitalism ran, at full speed, on the rocks which sank it, Mr. Norman is reported to have said, "I hold the hegemony of the world." At the time, some Englishmen spoke of "the second Norman Conquest of England" in reference to the fact that Norman's brother was head of the British Broadcasting Corporation. It might be added that Governor Norman rarely acted in major world problems without consulting with J. P. Morgan's representatives, and as a consequence he was one of the most widely traveled men of his day. 

Now these guys also ran the greatest big secret society, the greatest secret society that had many fronts and that's what I've been going over recently. Back with more - after this break. 

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, going through the dry dusty books, that no one reads, because they're not terribly exciting and we're taught that 'well the past doesn't matter anyway' and yet, if you want to know what their plan is and when you want to know that you've actually been living out a good part of the plan, without even knowing it and who was behind it, then that's up to you. The media will keep you mesmerised forever, because it's the same boys who own the media who are giving you the stories you're now talking about today and the ones that you'll have tomorrow.

You've got to understand the whys and the wherefores, because, literally, a good part of the world has been run by an organisation with many front groups, using all of the sciences and the social sciences and the manipulative qualities of persuasion and mind control that Bernays talked about. In fact, I'm sure Bernays was one of them, one of the early group, because you don't come out at 24, I don't care if you are a nephew of Freud, and get to go along with the President, President Wilson, to set up the League of Nations, at the end of World War I. You don't get that kind of contact; someone must guide you in and announce you.

When you look at Wilson as well, Wilson was part of this group, President Wilson was part of the group and he was run - and the history's all documented in the Anglo-American Establishment, by Professor Carroll Quigley, that Colonel Mandell House was the one who ran Wilson and Mandell House was in cahoots and got his orders from Sir Grey, from London, he eventually became Lord Grey, Earl Grey. They passed the information on, from the Milner Group and the Cecil Rhodes Foundation, to the US counterparts and they worked through the President; and, their whole idea, already, was to set up a world government. The League of Nations was part of it; and, here's Bernays there, to write the propaganda for the world that came out in all languages, saying why they would have to have a world government; and, it wasn't just a world government, because, obviously, everything boiled down to economics and who funded them all? The bankers funded them all; they have the greatest interest in economics.

Very-very complicated but you have to, truly read the books; but, from the Anglo-American Establishment, on page 197, Quigley, remember, who was all for this group, he believed in their intentions, he believed that the intellectual elite had the right to rule the world, because, just like the psychiatrists of their time too, remember, many of them were members, especially the famous ones, who got their names and their theories in the newspapers, to brainwash us. They believed that the people down below were just too irrational to conduct themselves in an orderly fashion, without supervision. On page 197, Professor Carroll Quigley says this, talking about the English branch of the CFR (The Royal Institute of International Affairs): 

This brief sketch of the Royal Institute of International Affairs does not by any means indicate the very considerable influence which the organization exerts in English-speaking countries in the sphere to which it is devoted. The extent of that influence must be obvious. The purpose of this chapter has been something else: to show that the Milner Group controls the Institute.  

That was back then. 

Once that is established, the picture changes. The influence of Chatham House 

Remember that became the OSS Headquarters, because they already were the secret society, they were into everything across the globe. 

The Influence of Chatham House appears in its true perspective, not as the influence of an autonomous body but as merely one of many instruments in the arsenal of another power. 

This is a professor talking, he chooses his words carefully.  

The influence of Chatham House appears in its true perspective, not as the influence of an autonomous body 

They were a bunch of guys doing as they wished. 

but as merely one of many instruments in the arsenal of another power. When the influence which the Institute wields is combined with that controlled by the Milner Group 

Remember the Round Tables, Cecil Rhodes Society for world government and then Lord Milner group, all combined into the RIIA. It says what you see what they're into 

in other fields in education, in administration, in