Feb. 18, 2010 (#517)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Feb. 18, 2010:
Cultural Creators -- Sentience Destroyers Turn People to Voyeurs:
"Julian Huxley, First CEO of UNESCO,
Well-Versed in Agenda, In Fact He Said So,
Take Down the Cultures, In Family Cause Strife,
Dethrone from its Pedestal the Sanctity of Life,
Destroy Male-Female Bonding, There's No Peril
In Promoting Promiscuity in a Society Sterile,
Having Fun and Variety Would Replace Family Values,
Multiple Shallow Encounters Means You Fall, There's Clues,
When You're Alone in Trouble, or Hounded by Creditors,
And Your Address Book is Full of Hedonistic Predators,
Turn to Social Services? You, They'll Manage,
Yet They Can't Undo Culture Creators' Damage"
© Alan Watt Feb. 18, 2010
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Feb. 18, 2010 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
cuttingthroughthematrix.com |
MAILING A/u> |
|
European
site includes all audios & downloadable transcripts in European languages for print up: |
|
Information for purchasing of Alan’s books, CDs, DVDs and donations:
Canada and America: PayPal, Cash, personal checks & for the US, international postal money orders
Outside the Americas: PayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram (Money Gram is cheaper)
PayPal Orders: Send a separate, additional, accompanying email with the PayPal order.
Those FREE OF computers: write to the address above
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Code of Silence" by Bruce Springsteen
There's a code of silence that we don't dare speak
There's a wall between us and a river so deep
And we keep pretending that there's nothing wrong
But there's a code of silence and it can't go on
Is the truth so elusive, so elusive as you can see
that it ain't enough baby
To bridge the distance between you and me
There's a list of grievance 100 miles long
There's a code of silence and it can't go on
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 18th 2010. For the newcomers out there and there are always new ones coming in, you should look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site, scroll down and bookmark all the other sites I have up there. That way if you ever find sticking on downloading, try these alternate sites and you should get through much easier. Everyone uses the .com site the following morning after the talk has been broadcast and apart from that sometimes I can’t upload to the main sites because even though I’m on unlimited disk space, somehow they don’t always get it automatically put up when it has to. The official sites are [listed above].
The quick tin can moment is when I rattle that tin can there. You don’t hear anything because there is nothing in it. But it’s up to you to keep me going because I’m probably the only host who does not front, in a sense, for advertising companies who generally sponsor you. They pay you directly if you mention who they are or bring them on as guests. Other ones are just financed by even bookselling clubs and some stuff like that. So it’s up to you to keep me going and you can do so by going into cuttingthroughthematrix.com and seeing what I have for sale – the books, CDs and DVDs – or you can donate to me. [Ordering and donation options listed above.] Those who get the disks burned and passed to them at meetings – who shy away from computers because they’ve got common sense – and they play them on CD players, you can get in touch with me at [address above].
A while ago I said it doesn’t matter when the big boys make their decisions for their long-term plans, their far-reaching plans… it doesn’t matter what happens, they carry on regardless. I said before too, it wouldn’t matter if you are up to your ears in snow, they’ll still harp on about global warming. If you notice in the news articles that are sneaking out, amongst all the incredible scandals that are bursting about the climate change nonsense, they are still prattling on because they have no other big plan made. This is all part of population reduction, altering our way of living until we are ALL third world country status, taking away Medicare, all that kind of stuff, gradually, across the world, for those who are in the masses, and sickness and death, disease and famine even will start killing us off. It’s a FAR-reaching plan because that’s what the socialists dreamed up when they first set up the Fabian Society. Look into it. Listen to the speeches by George Bernard Shaw, the co-founder of the Fabian Society. Remember, that’s just ONE BRANCH of the Royal Institute for International Affairs. It’s fascinating study when you get into it. The music is coming in so I’ll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix and what a matrix it is, isn’t it, as we are given our realities and our perceptions are distorted and altered and directed for us. The big boys make long-term plans, long-term goals, 50 years, sometimes 100 year plans. The Fabians themselves said it might take them 100 years to control the world through their international affiliations. Well, we’re pretty well there. You’ll find every government across the planet seems to be Fabian, regardless of the party symbol they use because the same plans are put into place through treaties, through the United Nations, exactly as the Fabians and the Royal Institute of International Affairs/CFR wanted to happen. That’s why they set up the United Nations in the first place, not as a debating table but as the embryo really that would grow into a world governing body.
The IPCC, this Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that the United Nations has, has really been exposed. It’s incredible they’re still there. They should be disbanded. It’s disgusting the lies they’ve told and have been exposed for telling, and all the cohorts they had from the professors across the world who were getting millions of pounds and dollars and grants thrown at them to “save the world.” That’s what you do to priests who terrify you and say the sun won’t come up tomorrow, you’ve got pay them and they’ll pray and do their voodoo and then voila, up it comes. It’s the same sort of idea.
This article is one of the latest scandals and it’s from Fox News.
The Next Climate-gate?
Updated February 10, 2010 / By John Lott - FOXNews.com
(Alan: It’s interesting how they first preface this. It’s misleading. They GIVE you how you are going to think about something and they leave you in a double-think. So this first little paragraph is to leave you in double-think.)
A new report points to a sharp reduction of weather stations by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (A: That’s NOAA, they call it.) in cooler locations around the world since 1990. (A: So they’ve been closing down these weather stations in cooler parts around the world since 1990. Now, listen to what they say…) Could that be why global temps have seen a steady rise over the last 20 years? (A: In other words, there hasn’t been a steady rise, if you understand what I’m saying. When you close down all of these different stations, across Russia alone after the Soviet Union fell apart, or was dismantled, I think there were over 1,000 of them that were closed down, all across Siberia and everything. That wasn’t taken into consideration for the real temperature of the world, you see. He goes on to say here…)
The global warming scandal keeps getting worse. Revelations over the few weeks show that many important assertions in the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change were based on misquotes and false claims from environmental groups, not on published academic research as it was originally presented. This is on top of the recent mess regarding data, where the three most relied-on data series used by the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007 assessment report still have not been released. Other data simply never seem to have existed or cannot be provided to other scientists.
But probably the most damaging report has come from Joseph D’Aleo, the first Director of Meteorology and co-founder of the Weather Channel, and Anthony Watts, a meteorologist and founder of SurfaceStations.org.
In a January 29 report, they find that starting in 1990, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) began systematically eliminating climate measuring stations in cooler locations around the world. Yes, that's right. They began eliminating stations that tended to record cooler temperatures and drove up the average measured temperature. The eliminated stations had been in higher latitudes and altitudes, inland areas away from the sea, as well as more rural locations. The drop in the number of weather stations was dramatic, declining from more than 6,000 stations (A: See how they fiddle everything.) to fewer than 1,500.
D’Aleo and Watts show that the jumps in measured global temperature occur just when the number of weather stations is cut. But there is another bias that this change to more urban stations also exacerbates. Recorded temperatures in more urban areas rise over time simply because more densely populated areas produce more heat. Combining the greater share of weather stations in more urban areas over time with this urban heat effect also tends to increase the rate that recorded temperatures tend to rise over time. (A: They were eliminating them across fields and forests and stuff like that, or hillsides and putting them in the cemented, concrete jungles of the cities. So of course they got what they expected to get.)
Their report provides examples of how the systematic elimination of stations and unexplained adjustments in temperature data caused measured temperatures to rise for Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Norway, Sweden, and the United States. Many adjustments change what would have been a drop in temperatures into an increase. (A: So they reversed the reality.) Take New Zealand, where D’Aleo and Watts note: “About half the adjustments actually created a warming trend where none existed; the other half greatly exaggerated existing warming.”
D’Aleo and Watts also criticize how these data adjustments are often unexplained or poorly documented. In one case involving James Hansen at NASA a Freedom of Information Act request has been unanswered for over two years.
The report details other fascinating temperature biases. For example, Siberia has experienced one the greatest increases in recorded warming. A large drop in the number of stations and the some missing data can explain part of the change, but apparently during the Soviet-era areas with lower recorded temperatures received more fuel and money, creating a real incentive for weather stations to lie.
The D’Aleo and Watts’ report also helps answer some puzzling questions about the report. One of the major ones questions has been the divergence in temperature data recorded by satellites in space and down here on the ground. That difference was very small when satellites first started being used during the 1980s but has grown over time, with ground observations showing a rise in temperature relative to the satellite data. The urban warming effect may not only explain this, but also why land warming has been so much greater than ocean warming.
All three terrestrial global-temperature datasets (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/ National Climatic Data Center, NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, and University of East Anglia) really rely on the same measures of surface temperatures. These three sources do not provide independent measures of how the world’s temperatures have changed over time. The relatively small differences that do arise from these three institutions result from how they adjust the raw data. (A: And by God, do they do some adjusting, and fiddling, and exaggerating as well.)
Flawed data leads to flawed conclusions.
But, it’s in line with the agenda and it really won’t matter much because all the socialists are truly on board, across the world, and they’ve got their governments to sign on and be goody-two-shoes to outdo each other to show they’re all on board to save the world and all the rest of it. Apart from that, about 5-6 years ago they were already trading carbon. It’s a done deal with the multi trillionaires that run the world and so they’ve already got this carbon thing. I call it the ‘sin taxes’ because it’s like collecting sacks of sins. You open it up and there is nothing in it, but that’s how it is. It’s absolute nonsense. It will take something like oil or the manufacturing of something and we can convert that into carbon that was used to create it and they make this GUESSTIMATION, big guesstimations, then they come up with, really, what the carbon output would be if you burned it, which you are not going to do. It’s an absolute BOGUS SCAM but it’s this scam that all the big boys have planned to rule our lives with. Really. They don’t even need the sacks to gather the sins, you know, the CO2. They just have to claim it’s there and work it out on paper, or build a special computer that you feed in fake data, just like they do at the IPCC, and you’ll get what you want. It’s great. There is no outlay. There’s no outlay, you don’t have to buy the sacks to contain the CO2 that you can’t see. When you fold them up anyway there’s nothing in it right. But that’s the cons that go on in the world and this is to rule our lives.
There are articles coming out now on climate change and how they are going to have to put it through and some governments are already doing it, with the far, far, left - left of Marx in fact - politicians that are on board. I’ll put a link up on my web sites to show you the one that’s been introduced for Ireland to sign. It’s a voluntary thing but it’s totalitarian. It was done on the 28th of October 2009.
Oireachtas Joint Committee on Climate Change and Energy Security
Climate Change law necessary for Ireland to demonstrate its commitment to become low carbon economy
Oireachtas.com / 28 October 2009
That will give you an idea of what’s to come here including the setting up of law forces to enforce it on the ordinary people who are not IN the carbon trading business. In other words, punishment crews. They’re going to rake in lots of money off you if there’s a little draft coming through your window, believe you me. This is a whole new area of infringement of your rights and lack of privacy and all the rest of it. And they’re going to give themselves, of course, more rights to come into your home because they’ve been teaching us for years now that’s it’s not yours anyway. You have no privacy and you don’t DESERVE privacy. Privacy is a sort of privilege, if you obey all the laws, pay all the fees and licenses and all the rest of it, and let every agency come into your home when you demand it. This is the Fabian way and I kid you not. I kid you not, that’s what it is.
Politicians are just low-level psychopaths that are picked by the big boys to front for them. They get funded IN to government. I watched one on Cameron recently, for Britain, who was pretending he was a conservative, going around getting fund raising from EVERYBODY you can imagine, even from Israel, the Israel lobby. He’s promising them everything if they just back him financially. Every group that’s out there, he’s saying, I’m your man; I’m YOUR man. The left are even worse. The program I watched – it was a disk that was sent to me – showed you the different politicians and the Labour bunch going around doing the same thing. They’re just low-level con men that will say whatever they are told to say to get IN to power and have a good time. That’s how they are, low-level psychopaths; but they don’t run the world, the ones above them do. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. As I say, these politicians that are SELECTED are just yes-men to whoever backs them and they’ve got terrible records in their personal lives when you look into them, of how many of them are on charges for one thing or another, lots of drunk driving charges, personal bankruptcies, credit cards run to the limit and over, all that kind of stuff. These are the guys who generally get into politics. The psychopaths smell which way the wind is blowing basically, and they suddenly become an advocate of whatever is popular. They are so immature; I think it’s because of all the booze they take all the time, at least the British Parliament. Here is an article to do with what they are all about.
Ministers (A: That’s politicians. They call them ministers over there.) lavished £9m (A: Of the taxpayer money, right.) on climate change stunts... but public opinion is left cold by global warming 'propaganda'
By Steve Doughty / 18th February 2010 / Mail Online
A disastrous series of failed climate change publicity stunts cost taxpayers £9million, it emerged yesterday.
The projects paid for by the Government’s Climate Challenge Fund did next to nothing to change public opinion, a Whitehall report found.
It said the initiatives were almost entirely preaching to the converted and that trying to drum up interest through sensationalism only put people off.
Schemes included a £40,000 DVD (A: That’s quite a lot. You can make a hit record with that.) in which schoolchildren explained that in ten years everyone will have to wear sunglasses all the time, because the sun will be shining more. (A: These are the kind of stupid things they do.)
A tent set up in shopping centres and labelled an ‘experiential climate dome’ was subsidised by Whitehall (A: That’s the taxpayers’ money again.) to the tune of nearly £400,000; a computer game cost £47 every time it was played; and a series of ‘ challenging pub quizzes’ about climate change cost more than £85,000.
Large grants went to councils, schools and youth groups for (A: Listen to this…) ‘attitude modification’ programmes and to assure the public that man-made global warming is an established scientific fact. (A: So, once you brainwash the children, they don’t have much of a chance to be honest with you because it’s a real indoctrination they get and lies. Quite interesting, ‘attitude modification’ programs, did you think that’s what your schools were about? Pavlov is alive and well!)
And £200,000 went to Oxford University to ‘take climate change into the community’. (A: To get it into the community, with little posters and little handouts and stuff. £200,000, that’s not bad work if you can get it, eh?)
Details of the projects and the report for Ed Miliband’s Department of Energy and Climate Change – which was never published – were unearthed by the TaxPayers’ Alliance through Freedom of Information requests.
Matthew Sinclair, the group’s research director, said: ‘The Government has clearly crossed the line from public information to propaganda on climate change.
‘Many of the Climate Challenge Fund projects are utterly bonkers (A: That means crazy.) and misleading, and come with a huge price tag.
‘Despite a fortune having been spent on these projects, the fund has failed even on its own spuripeopleous terms. It is infuriating for taxpayers to see their money squandered on attempts to scare and indoctrinate the public.’
The report by consultants Brook Lyndhurst said the projects largely failed to produce any changes in the opinions among their target audiences. It judged that ‘the aggregate picture is one of neutral or very modest positive shifts’.
Future programmes should ‘avoid sensationalist or shocking imagery in climate change messages, since respondents are likely to find this off-putting’, it said.
The report added that those attracted to the projects were ‘already interested in climate change’. (A: Meaning they’re already brainwashed.) It suggested that in many cases organisations viewed the funding as ‘a way to secure additional resources’ (A: Of course they do.), and said the running the projects often did not have ‘necessary skills’. (A: Of course they won’t. What do you need to lie? What skills does it take?)
The money was paid to public organisations and voluntary groups between 2006 and 2008.
Details emerged after several other high-profile climate change failures in recent months.
The Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia (A: Which were getting millions of pounds in grants.), which received £16,000 from the Climate Challenge Fund (A: …as well, on top of that.), has come under fire over leaked emails which show scientists attempted to hide data from sceptics. (A: Professor Jones himself already admitted, and I read it yesterday from the paper, that the earth has actually been COOLING. And he goes for 15 years; he won’t go for 20 yet, but he’s getting better than he was.)
And the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has been found to have made exaggerated and ill-informed claims, for example over the rate at which Himalayan glaciers are melting. Its chief, Rajendra Pachauri, has faced calls to resign. (A: But he’s too busy writing his pornographic novels. That’s a fact; that’s what he does to pass the time. Delusions of grandeur, isn’t it? Power goes to their little heads.)
There’s a caller from Alaska and it’s John. Are you there John?
John: How are you today?
Alan: I’m hanging on here.
John: I’ve heard you mention on a previous show on how they are creating this world culture that’s world government indoctrination and they are pushing it through schools.
Alan: Hold on and we’ll come back on that topic after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, talking to John from Alaska about the school system. Carry on, John.
John: My journey to awakening to how they’ve been trying to create this world culture, I’ve come across UNESCO, its Purpose and its Philosophy written by Julian Huxley. I’m sure you are probably familiar with that.
Alan: I’ve read some of his stuff on the air, in fact, from his books.