WE ARE BUT THE AUDIENCE"
© Alan Watt March 10, 2008

Title & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - March 10, 2008 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes and Callers' Comments)

WWW.CUTTINGTHROUGHTHEMATRIX.COM

www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu

"Code of Silence" by Bruce Springsteen

There's a code of silence that we don't dare speak
There's a wall between us and a river so deep
And we keep pretending that there's nothing wrong
But there's a code of silence and it can't go on

Hi folks. I'm Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on March 10th, 2008. I always ask newcomers to look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com and go over the material that's available for free. Lots and lots and lots of talks over the years on the histories and the people who brought us to the position we're in right now, as we go through the big transition into open "global governance" as they call it, which is just another form of tyranny and the big boys at the top make no real bones about that. The pretense of government as we've had it was just that. It was a pretense. Also look into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu where you can find transcripts of a lot of the shows in the various languages of Europe.

That's the hard part in this world is to go through the transition. People are trying to hold on to what they think is normal in a time when all the normal has been already destroyed. We’re in flux and when you're in flux you eventually will find all new kinds of new norms are brought forth from the top, because all culture is coordinated at the top and promoted downwards to the public, who simply adapt it to their own lives. They adapt their opinions, views and all the rest of it and that's why we're in flux. We’re in flux now because it's intended that all the old world, everything that used to be, has to be destroyed and we have to be all accepting. That's the key to it, all accepting of everything, and that means never ending acceptance of everything that it becomes new; and when new types of humans and so on are presented to the public, they've already been conditioned through movies and fiction to accept it. After all, we're all human, so it says.

Even with the movie "Artificial Intelligence" we saw that theme being pushed over and over and over again and the "Millennium Man" I think it was called as well with Robin Williams. They had the same idea to get their message across to the public: "what is human?" We have trans-this and trans-that and now it's going into post-humanism and trans-humanism as the old types supposedly dies away, and to the average person they think we're just evolving and it's happening as science just open pages and finds things out for the first time—and nothing is further from the truth. The sciences published to the public and what they apparently discover were known a long, long time ago, even with genetics. That is why in the 1920's big players were very confident and published lots of books on the coming society, the Eugenical Society, where everyone would be programmed scientifically and also eventually would all lead in to a eugenics program with people who are allowed to breed and those who are not allowed to breed.

We also see fertility rates dropping like a stone and that was also forecast because the big boys had lots of meetings, which they published, world meetings on reducing the population, where they discussed all the methods to bring that about, including the food, water and everything else that we take for granted. Therefore when the United Nations publishes the next sperm count (which is about time that they did it, they always do it every year) and it's down 75 percent or probably 80 percent, it will be no big deal. They never back up why it’s not a crisis, because it's intended that way. Back with more after these messages.

Hi folks. I'm Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through the Matrix, this big, big mass that clouds reality and we have distortions of our perceptions, which are well backed up by repetition as Mr. Russell said. Repetition does wonders and eventually when all your friends are repeating the same stuff you'll be the odd one out if you don't go along with them. They'll think you're odd. That's all right. That's a good sign that you're actually waking up and you're looking at the robots around you and that's when decision time comes. Do you want to remain in the land of robots and talk robo-speak or do you want to say something that matters? And hopefully someone out there will hear it. That's what I do, trying to cut through this incredible scientific indoctrination we've been given, the very indoctrination that was written about and spoken about many lectures worldwide by Lord Bertrand Russell. The scientific technique of indoctrination and he did mention it wouldn't just be through school. It would be long lasting. It would be your whole life long in fact. Continuing education through propaganda and they brought onboard the big marketing companies to make that happen and it's been tremendously successful.

You also find CIA, MI6 and other big spooky agencies have been running the culture industry since at least openly – well, amongst themselves since the 1950's. Now they're only admitting that they've been doing it. That also goes with the fashion industry and I always tie that back to Plato's Republic written 2,300 odd years ago, where he talked about this very technique of creating a reality for the masses and how even then all culture had to be authorized from the top down because anything coming up from the grassroots could have unforeseen consequences; it would cause ripple effects in their system. Therefore everything is authorized. Even the rebellious outfits that every generation are given by the fashion industry, they're designed for them. It's all okayed.

When you go back to the writings of Charles Galton Darwin, quite a big character up there with eugenics, he was also a physicist in the 1940's and '50's and he wrote "The Next Million Years." In that book it's almost a question-answer type of scenario, almost on the style of Plato where he had these dialogues with real or imaginary people, but it's a way to get their information out to their own friends. Charles Galton Darwin, the grandson of Charles Darwin, you'll find it's interesting because their purpose is hereditary. It's so closely inbred that the bankers will turn out bankers who will stay bankers and the guys into eugenics and so on will stay in the same field for generations. They're almost like clones of their parents they're so inbred and it's the closest thing there are to clones when you have three, four, five, six, generations of inbreeding between two families.

He talks about the structure and function of government and he said on page 193. He says:

"If transportation is easy world conquest will be easier both for military reasons and because the more uniform culture should make the world government more acceptable."

Alan: A "uniform culture" and this is happening right now. People think we’re living in diversity but they're not. You see when everyone has no moral opinions about things, everything is relative, moral relativism, then you think that anything goes – but who does it serve? Now those at the bottom might think it serves us, but it's to serve those at the top because they introduce the new norms as we’re going through letting go of all the old ones. Very simple technique and you have to be able to look at both sides of everything to understand the big picture.

He goes on to say too, this is Darwin:

"Widespread wealth can never be common in an overcrowded world…"

Alan: Always been a big problem with these guys is overpopulation. He says:

"…and so in most countries of the future the government will inevitably be autocratic or oligarchic..."

Alan: This is what we've got you see.

"…some will give government and some bad, and the goodness or badness will depend much more on the personal merits of the rulers than it does in a more democratic country. Whatever forms the government may take, there can be little doubt that the world will spontaneously divide itself into what I shall call provinces, that is to say regions…"

Alan: Now remember, he wrote that back in the 1950's and that's what we have under the United Nations today and we're amalgamating the Americas and so on. He talks about regions.

"…though with no permanently fixed boundaries, which possess some homogeneity of climate, character and interests. I use the same word whether the different provinces are federated together, or whether they are what we should now call separate sovereign states. How large will these provinces tend to be? That will depend on the means of communication and transport, and so once again there arises the question of whether the fuel problem is solved wholly or partially or not at all. In the past the chief means of communication was the horse, and the countries of Europe are still mostly of a size adopted to suit this almost extinct means of transport, though some of the more newly formed ones do show a trace of the influence of the railway. None of them are really of a size suited to the motor-car or the aeroplane, or to present power production, whether by coal or water-power et cetera. If the fuel problem is solved completely, so that mechanical power and transportation is available in the future to a greater extent even than at present, then the provinces will be large; for example, the whole of Europe may well be one, and the whole of North America another."

Alan: Then he goes on to describe how human nature is not designed to live in cities, something that the ancients knew. The ancients knew that in the stories of Nimrod, who is only one name for the same character that was worshipped in every country at one time. Nimrod was always given the title of the city-builder along with his wife. The city was the first artificial structure to contain people and within a city, since nothing is grown, then they cannot support themselves; they need money to do it, a substitute for barter. They can then hire people, which was the first hired army as well, and they went off to conquer other city-states and rural areas. This system goes back a long time and that's what they call the beginning of civilization: the building of the city-states. That's what it's all about, an artificial system with a religion behind it, but Galton Darwin himself understands this. He knows his history and he has access or had access to archives, as all the big ones do. Archives that are kept closed to the public where the real histories and complete histories are kept.

Some professors admit to this, that they – maybe one in 60 or one in 80 – are eventually given access to certain archives and even then they have to be very careful what they're allowed to tell the public. People should read Charles Galton Darwin's "The Next Million Years," a fantastic read because everything he talked about then wasn't coming from his own mind. He'd been at many, many global meetings in his day with the elite, his own class, where all of this was discussed.

Getting back to the city, he said that even though it’s an unnatural state for people to be crowded into cities, he talks about them being easier to control by authorities because they're dependent upon everything that they need for survival ultimately from those authorities and their sort of pipelines of food, water, et cetera that come through. He said through scientific training they could become used to it and maybe even made to be dependent upon it, thinking it was the most natural thing that there was.

Those who've grown up in cities don't realize that prior to the Great Depression in the Americas especially, most folk, 97 percent lived outside the cities on the land and that's where they were far healthier mentally and physically. However, the Depression was the means to get them in to the big cities and to lose their land and you see the effects of it today. Now everyone is under layer upon layer upon layer of massive bureaucracies and various organizations of enforcement, from child welfare all the way up to the police and military and all the rest of it. Quite a system we live in and yet because it's been done incrementally it seems quite natural to most people. You turn on television and your favorite sitcoms are on. The world must be all right. Very, very simple. People should look into Charles Galton Darwin's writings because as I say he wasn't speaking off the top of his head.

He does mention too the creat

WE ARE BUT THE AUDIENCE" © Alan Watt March 10, 2008

WE ARE BUT THE AUDIENCE"
© Alan Watt March 10, 2008