ALAN WATT
"CUTTING THROUGH THE MATRIX"
LIVE ON WTPRN
"DEFINITION OF A GOOD CITIZEN–
SEE NO EVIL, HEAR NO EVIL, SPEAK NO EVIL, HAVE FUN"
January 3, 2008
Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt – January 3, 2008 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes and Callers' Comments)
WWW.CUTTINGTHROUGHTHEMATRIX.COM
www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu
"Code of Silence" by Bruce Springsteen
Is the
truth so elusive, so elusive as you can see
that it ain't enough baby
To bridge the distance between you and me
There's a list of grievance 100 miles long
There's a code of silence and it can't go on
Well you
walk with your eyes open
But your lips they remain sealed
While the promises we made are broken
Beneath the truth we fear to reveal
Now I need to know now darlin'
I need to know what's goin' on so c'mon
Hi folks. I'm Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on January 3rd, 2008, a brave new year indeed. For newcomers, look into my website cuttingthroughthematrix.com and you can check out lots of previous talks I've given on the histories and the organizations down through the years, even back down through the centuries that lead up and have led up to where we are today and where we're going. Look into my other site alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for the transcripts which you can download in the various tongues of Europe.
I seldom ever, ever turn on a television to watch anything. I actually watch the news once in a blue moon to see what kind of spiel the people are getting and I did that tonight just to see. I went into the other world, you know the world that's presented to the public that they swallow without question and sure enough there was the fulfillment of Mr. Rumsfeld's promise when he said when the oil was approaching the $50 a barrel mark he said we're breaking the psychological barrier of 50 bucks. He says, don't be surprised to see it double in about a year and that has happened, it's about $100 a barrel and this man wasn't going by supply and demand. He was going by the statistics which they'd worked out years before when they made all of their plans to takeover the Middle East and the oil producing countries. That's why he knew, because in logistics and in planning for military campaigns you figure out all of these kinds of things. You factor it all in and so it's no surprise to the big boys who started the whole agenda that kicked it off, the Brave New World scenario, the New World Order coming into view scenario when they kicked it off in earnest in 2001.
We're galloping along and it all ties in perfectly well, all meshes so well when we follow it and we see that what they want eventually they want habitat areas with no transportation. No transportation, that means no "non-essential vehicles" as they say. Now what could that possibly mean? It would mean a drastic way and a change of living and that's exactly what it's all about, the Agenda 21 the United Nations released a long time ago. It was about the 21st century and their plans to bring in this new non-drivable society that would use public transportation only, but they just didn't tell you how they'd get you from your car to the bus; and it's becoming rather evident to a few as they gradually wake up and see it happening because people will get priced off the road. It's quite simple. "The power of the purse" they call it and people will get priced right off the road into their little habitat areas where you can rent only. That's coming, that's the other part still to come is the housing collapse and then they come out with a new plan which is rental only for this manageable society.
To watch tonight's news, of course, everything was about supply and demand and very vague – everything is very vague on it and why things are happening and they were even astounded that there's going to be a warm current coming into Canada in January. Every January we get the January thaw for a week or so and this is the typical January thaw coming up, but because they have no memory and they don't remind the people. They don't nudge the people you see. It's not their job to nudge you and make you remember, so they always present it as bizarre weather. Bizarre weather. Everything is going crazy. We're getting bizarre weather. Well, this is winter in Canada. We get the January thaw and then it goes back into deep freeze for a while too. This is natural.
Yet to listen to the world as it's presented to the masses, everything is a big puzzle. It's just big puzzle with spontaneous happenings across the planet that no one ever foresaw and they bring on experts too who go round in circles and contradict each other and leave you even more confused and then you throw your hands up and put it down to acts of God. Everything is an act of God, I guess, and maybe they're right. They just don't tell you which god they're talking about because I think it's a two-legged one sitting in some high building somewhere.
However, that's the real world. That's the real world. We're going straight into an agenda and at the same time we're seeing the circuses for the public and I hate to do this. I hate to sort of diffuse people's fire or put it out, dampen it, but the whole lead up to American politics is so much like show business it becomes a bit tiring. It's like circuses and Canada isn't much different. Canada's copied a lot of the U.S. system in election times when they pull out balloons and everybody gets badges and wear all kind of fancy hats and big banners and it's a rah-rah thing and it's just like a circus. Like clowns in a circus and I don't understand what that's got to do with the seriousness of the situation, to be honest with you. I can't get into this party mood. It just doesn't work on me.
We have all different parties pushing – the mainstream parties pushing really for the same agenda and pretending that they're not of course, but they all go along the same agenda because they have done for as long as I've been alive in every country because we're all on this global agenda. It was a done deal when they signed it all into the United Nations charter at the end of World War II, but they must keep the public thinking that we're still somehow the same, even though the average person can surely look back on their lives and say my God how things have changed. Whether you're 20, 30, 40 years at all makes no difference. It's drastic changes and very quick, very, very quick.
When I was born you generally had two parents and that had been the norm for many, many centuries, way, way down through time. Within about 20 years, starting with Hollywood of course and magazines and television interviewers about Hollywood and the stars breaking up and getting divorced and all that, then everybody followed suit because people don't think for themselves. They follow the stars and if the stars do it, it must be okay. It was about that time too that they were throwing religion out the window and the community that used to help each other and they were bringing in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy began to work with the stars as well and there was a big flood of them into psychotherapy and that became the norm and everyone followed suit and it became big business, so they replace one religion with another, you see.
They also replaced the family with single parent families and that's all happened in a few short years, not because it was time for it to happen by some law of nature, but because it was pushed that way from a hundred different sources and those involved didn't understand that at all because most folk don't think through things. In fact, you'll find unfortunately most people don't think period. They can parrot verbatim often what they're told on debates and on television but they don't really think about things and come to their own conclusions at all, pretty well about anything, and it's a sad thing to say but it's very, very true.
However, when I see these elections getting geared up for the circuses and the mud slinging, it's just entertainment for the public. At least that's how I view it, and we'll get little scandals with different politicians and that keeps us chomping away on tidbits and it's all a show, a big circus show because the big agenda marches on. You know how many bureaucrats are involved in the global system that we're actually in? You don't elect any one of those bureaucrats in the federal government. Not a single one and the guys at the top, the heads of these departments, they know what their agenda is and they can go back to the founding charter of the United Nations and see their role right in there what their job is. Therefore it doesn't matter who gets voted in or out of politics, the system rattles on regardless and that was the way it was setup.
H.G. Wells wrote about it a long time ago. He said this basically bypasses politics, where bureaucrats now can send departments across to other countries or the League of Nations (that was the embryo of the United Nations) and get the job done without the interference of politicians.
Then we have Professor Carroll Quigley coming out with "Tragedy & Hope" and the big book that backed it up it was called "The Anglo-American Establishment," where he fills in all the little blank spaces of history in between the battles and tells you why they happened. Who funded them and what their long-term plan was and he says that there was a parallel government in existence back in the 1960's in his own book.
How did he know?
He was the official historian for this group that was the parallel government in the U.S. and he said the reason that they came into being is because there were too many irreconcilable differences in society between groups and segments, and sub-segments and sub-cultures and all the rest of it, through society to have any peace. They couldn't get anything done with arguing and therefore what they'd done is this society made sure that every president and his advisers belonged to the same institution. The rest down below, all the little politicians, you know the wanna-bees, the little psychopaths, they're allowed a certain amount of competition within their parties for brownie points and slogging the other guys, but had no real say. Their job is to act like trained seals and clap their fins and cheer their leader. That's what their job is – the party over everything else.
However, the guys at the top are always picked and vetted by The Council on Foreign Relations for the United States, so much so that here in Canada where the people, I don't know, they can tell us more I guess because we're so apathetic maybe, but they do tell us more. We had on the Canadian Broadcasting Television (that's the National Broadcasting) run by the government, the BBC of Canada, they gave us in 2005 a mainstream news blurb from The Council on Foreign Relations acting as the council itself instead of being advisers to anything privately to newsmen. The whole panel was there and they said that they basically had drafted up this amalgamation scheme for the Americas and given it to the governments of Canada and the States and Mexico.
The Council on Foreign Relations is a non-governmental body. No one votes them in. At least the plebeians don't get to vote them in. They are a private organization, supposedly, but they belong to the Royal Institute for International Affairs, which once again is private but it's owned by royalty. That's why it's the Royal Institute for International Affairs. It works on behalf of the old aristocracy, the ones with the big, big money and the big international bankers. These are the ones who groom presidents and prime ministers and they will never let it out of their grasp and they certainly won’t do it by people saying "please, please be fair" or "please be democratic."
During the Cold War they said that never would they allow this to happen again, the possibility, the possibility ever of people changing their system and bringing in a different type of system in, especially one run by the people, so they had declared war on the peoples where they have this Council on Foreign Relations or Royal Institute for International Affairs. It's only called the Council on Foreign Relations for non-British Commonwealth countries. Every Commonwealth country has their own Department of International Affairs and we have the Canadian one for Canada. We have the Australian one, the New Zealand one. They even have one in Pakistan, The Council on Foreign Relations, that is, and another one in India.
They're all over the world and remember their history. They were started off as a supposedly Secret Society that Cecil Rhodes ran and it wasn't so secret after all because it acted as a sort of unofficial agency that stirred up wars in other countries. They started the South African or the Boer War. They were behind that and Britain just had to come in of course once it started that these guys had created. Britain came in with the army officially to rescue the poor British subjects, but it was started deliberately and so they acted like an unofficial James Bond organization and they took the techniques from the Jesuits. That's in their old founding charter. They merged eventually with the Lord Alfred Milner Group that had the debating societies, the Round Table Societies, and then were given a Royal Charter to exist officially on behalf of the Crown, a private body. I'll be back with more after these messages.
Hi folks. Alan Watt back with Cutting Through the Matrix. I'm just giving my spontaneous little blurb on some of the things I was thinking about today. I don't prepare my talks at all. I don't have staff to punch up guests and so on that I ask to come on and give me a schedule for the day. I just do what I have to do at the time and I think that's more realistic and I don't have any particular ulterior motive to say what I say. I just see life as I do see it. I say it as I see it.
Now we've got Lee from Texas on the line. Are you there, Lee?
Lee: Hi.
Alan: How are you?
Lee: Fantastic, thank you. I got your books right around this time last year. Sorry, a couple of weeks ago and I just finished the first part of it. I have a question for you based on some of the talks you've given and that would be and I'm not asking you to say anything that would implicate yourself or anything. I get the impression you're kind of isolated. You talk about the woodcutting and everything else. You've talked about the fact that they've said flat out there's going to be flashmobs and everything else. At the same time, I've also heard you say don't just be the positive and you get flattened if you go to the negative stuff. I mean do you still think people should be like making preparations for almost like nuclear winter type conditions, as goofy as that sounds?
Alan: I think they should definitely – there's nothing goofy about it. I mean even some of the U.S. states recently have told people to stock up with food and so on for about three months for national emergencies and we know that the Council on Foreign Relations, The Royal Institute have done their study, an ongoing study. A massive study too into the world's food supply and now mainstream news is talking about coming food shortages so we know it's coming. They're telling us gradually what's coming because it's planned that way. I think if people can at least stock up on things that will get them through some hard times until they can get their wits together to do something more, it just makes common sense.
Lee: One of the things I love that you've said. I've got friends that will sit there and go well it's another 9/11 we'll get it back like when Roosevelt was there. I'm like oh really. You should read up on Roosevelt.
Alan: They have no idea. The American Constitution went out the window with Roosevelt.
Lee: Then you mentioned well they want to go back to 1776. Which part? The slavery part?
Alan: The slavery part, yes, or go forward and have the Civil War. You see most Americans don't even know their history. They get it from Hollywood.
Lee: So you've got to convince because there's a group that you will see that's awake that is running under the guise of like the Founding Fathers. They'll close their show out with Thomas Paine and everything else, and you've got to almost like take what little illusion of freedom or whatever we've been given and use that to fashion almost like a temporary shield until we can make something better. But we're all fighting for different goals it almost sounds like.
Alan: Well there's the key. That's the crux of the matter. You're right on there. Society has been so scattered as far as its particular functions go as a society. It has been under battle for the last 60 odd years, tremendously so, and they haven't recovered from that and they probably won't. You've got everyone separated from everyone else. You've had scientific breakthroughs that have changed society completely and even the relations between males and females. Everything has been drastically radically altered and you also have a society that's now built up as primarily a service economy. It's not a productive economy. You don't make things and so it's fine at the moment, as long as this would go on where most folk can get a job at least to pay their rent and so on, male or female, and survive. However, because you're not producing anything, a service economy, as the big economists know—because we had all this given to us in Britain when they did the Economic Union—a service economy is not meant to go on for very long. It's like a dog paddling in the water and it can't get out. It can't get back up on to the land. You can only paddle for so long and so it's a temporary patch before bigger things come down on you, so they understand this.
Lee: I love how they've gone ahead and done the complete double-speak thing in just about everywhere when I went through Part 1 of Cutting Through. For example, and I don't like reality TV and once in a while I turn the TV on, either plug in a documentary or whatever, then just try and to read. But they've like for example you've talked about the only way we're going to survive is by working together and the number one type of show like "Survivor" is all about flashing and cheating and lying. It's funny that the total twisting they've done to it.
Alan: It works so well. That's the exact technique as they've encouraged everyone to think they're doing their own thing, then there's no cohesion in society, so it's very clever. They've encouraged what people really do think as doing their own thing, but when you look at them apart they're all doing the same things. It's not an individualistic thing. They're actually doing what's being encouraged but there's no cohesion at all. I mean they can hardly relate to each other in any lasting relationship of any kind. That's how bad it is and when that happens government then is your total boss, you see, and there's no one to stand around you. There's not even a family to stand around you anymore. There's not even that much of a remnant of a clan system.
Lee: My family will look at some of this stuff but I don't think they're ready to abandon their savior, which of course alienates you know that kind of thing. Well thank you so much for your work and your time Alan.
Alan: And thanks for calling in.
Lee: I'll be ordering some more stuff as well besides the book so looking forward. Thank you, sir.
Alan: Bye now. It's true enough during the New Deal era and that's what it was called when FDR brought out the New Deal. That was an official announcement. When people hear it's the New Deal, it's a phrase to them. It really meant – the old deal was the Constitution. That's what he meant. They all knew that at the top. Here's the New Deal and he basically socialized everything or the government took control over so much and before that you literally had most folk living on the land, exactly what Jefferson said. Jefferson said that this Constitution, and that's backed up by Franklin and others, is meant to preserve peace and safety for people who are agriculturally based and he was so pleased. In fact Jefferson said that every small family that he passed had its own at least one cow and maybe a goat or something and they could sustain themselves, but it was meant for an agricultural society where people had their land, that was theirs. After the Great Depression, and it was still going on when Roosevelt came in, they also altered all that. Before you had about 90-odd percent of the people on the land and after the Great Depression they'd all been moved into the cities and now you have about 90-odd percent of the public in the cities where you're totally controlled and subservient and dependent on the system and that was all planned that way. It was all planned.
Even with the make-work projects that they did, the big massive make-work projects, it was very similar to the Soviet Union. They did the same thing there by using the people at the bottom to build roads and so on, giving them army uniforms, getting them ready for the army mode, living in camps because World War II was getting set up then, so it was already training them to right into the army and bingo it worked. Nothing happens spontaneously in this system. These projects including wars are worked out way in advance. Way, way in advance by very good strategists. That was the New Deal and the other big one of course the next part, Part 3, 4, 5 was when George Bush, Sr. made his big statement on 9/11 back in 1991 that there is a New World Order coming into view – "The Big Idea." That was the next official new system coming in. Back with more after the following messages.
"Code of Silence" by Bruce Springsteen
There's a code of silence that we don't dare speak
There's a wall between us
And the river's too deep
We keep pretending that there's nothing wrong
But there's a code of silence and it can't go on
Hi folks. I'm Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through the Matrix because it truly is a matrix. It's a matrix. It's your reality, reality that was presented to you at birth and then was further indoctrinated into you by your education and television, entertainment and so on. It's a lifelong process and they used to have an Archbishop of Canterbury in the 1940's. They called him "The Red Bishop," who was a globalist and he went around the world making statements about this coming society and he said there'll be a world where all adults will be continui