Aug. 1, 2010
Alan Watt in Telephone Interview (Live) to
"Axiom 2010: The Truth Tellers" Conference,
Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
held by We Are Change Utah, with host Clint Richardson
(2 Hours)
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
|
|
cuttingthroughthematrix.com |
MAILING
ADDRESS: |
|
European
site includes all audios & downloadable transcripts in European
languages for print up: |
|
Information for purchasing of Alan’s books, CDs, DVDs and donations:
Canada and America: PayPal, Cash, personal checks &
for the US, international postal money orders / for Canada, INTERNAL postal money orders
(America: Postal Money orders - Stress the INTERNATIONAL pink one, not the green internal one.)
Outside the Americas: PayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram (Money Gram is cheaper)
PayPal Orders: Use the donate button – and –
Send a separate, additional, accompanying email with the PayPal order.
Those FREE OF computers: write to the address above
Clint Richardson: I introduce you to his digital audio stream, but if you've never gone to Cutting Through the Matrix, cuttingthroughthematrix.com, which is up on the screen, this is Mr. Alan Watt. Now, Mr. Alan Watt is up in Canada, from the East actually. He's a regular guest on shows like Alex Jones, actually he's got his own show on the Republic Broadcasting Network. Is that right Alan?
Alan: That's right.
Richardson: So good. Alright, without further ado, I'm going to turn down the lights, I'm going to let you talk to us and tell us your knowledge, and one second here, I'll turn down the lights. And Alan Watt, welcome to the Axiom Conference.
Alan: It's a pleasure to be here with you. It's a pleasure in fact, I tell you, to talk to people who are active and doing something, and who are keeping themselves informed as to what's happening to their country, and trying to do something about it. Because it's about time that people got up and challenged these massive pre-planned changes, planned a long time ago, like a long-term business plan, with implementation always happening on the date that was first suggested or put down in writing, many years ago. And the U.S. has been used, really, since WWII, I would say, as the financier of the whole international system of Socialism. And of course, the last ones to be Socialized and brought into it were the ones back home. In fact, the rulers neglected to inform the citizenry of the U.S. what their function was. And they've been used by their tax money and by their military, and through rhetoric of course, and deception, by the media, to fund projects abroad, which are really bringing a whole world into this new Free Trade, as they call it, system. A system which is not free at all. It's not Free Trade, it's selective trade only for the big internationalist boys, but it's also going to open up the gates in the U.S. to incredible immigration from all over the world, because part of the Free Trade agreement is to do with the unrestricted flow of labor and goods across borders, with the intention eventually of eradication of those borders. They can eradicate the borders and still contain you, because you're going to be put into regions, as you well know. They've done this in the UK already, and in some other European countries, where they've done away with your county name on your address, or your postal code. All you need is your street number, the postal code, the region, and that's how you get your mail now. And they want to do the same with the U.S.
Everyone's been used for generations in the U.S. unfortunately, by internationalists that bypassed the general political arena, although they did put their own people within that arena. They didn't have to elect them actually. They prefer to appoint people, just like Carroll Quigley said in Tragedy and Hope. They prefer to appoint them to top strategic positions, in the Pentagon, in the area of trade, finance, and so on. So it doesn't matter which presidents they put in. Sometimes their own, sometimes not. It doesn't really matter. The high bureaucratic levels are really running the show. They know what the agenda is, they know their part in it, and they are there for life, regardless of the guys who are elected to go in. We do know as well, that some politicians and some parties definitely know their role in it. And it's the first time I've seen in the U.S. so many appointees or czars as the media first started coming out and calling them. For very good reasons, because the New World Order system is really a new Soviet in a sense. It's called Communitarianism in other countries, but it really is a new Soviet system. It's so interesting to me to realize that Lenin talked about the length of the dictatorship over the proletariat as he called the people. He said it will last about a generation or seventy years, then it would merge with the Western system, and out of this dialectic would come a new system, not quite Capitalist and not quite Communist. And what he's talking about is a new Socialist system, run by experts, where gradually the rights would be taken away out of the hands of free citizens, until they're not free anymore and where appointees will be put over Communitarian areas to guide and direct the system of your community. That's been pushed big time. And I noticed, I think it was Napa valley, in the States, they've already implemented Communitarianism from their own local councils there. They're putting it in full force.
As I say, it's not very often I get a chance to talk to people who are really following this and what's happening, who don't know the whole picture, very few people do know the whole picture, it would take lifetimes to go through it. It's so enormous, it's so huge. However, we do know this, that all the treaties that were signed through the United Nations by all participants, who signed on in 1946 at the San Francisco conference with the United Nations, agreed to sell out their national sovereignty of all the countries. They were traitors. Every single country did that back then. And they also did say they would implement all treaties passed to them by the United Nations. That is a big, big part of it, because the United Nations remember is not an elected body. It's nothing to do with the citizenry. No one knows anyone who's voted anybody into the United Nations. And yet it uses this term democracy all the time, and they want America to go off and fight for democracy, using NATO, and various other arms of the UN, but they're not democratic at all. They've said themselves that the New World Order has to be an authoritarian system, and that we're in a post-democratic era, because the citizenry themselves, there's too many factions fighting for different things, and they can't get the job done. They can't get their plan worked out, therefore they bypass the citizenry altogether by putting in an authoritarian system, and they will direct society by experts and scientists and so on.
Now, that must not be allowed to happen. Once it's happened, and it's on the books, my fear, because I've watched things like this before, my fear is that the citizenry always adapts so darn quickly to things they should not be adapting to in the first place. People generally think there's going to be one big final catastrophe, and then the whole world is changed. No, it's done incrementally, and we adapt to things step by step by step, rather than nip totalitarian measures in the bud, as soon as we hear about them. The problem being of course that in the U.S. there has not been until recently organizations who are trying to keep their Constitution. You don't realize too, outside the U.S., that no other country ever came up with any constitution where the individual had rights. And because of that, many people have taken it for granted, when the good times rolled, and they forget it when the bad times roll as well. They forget they're supposed to have rights, because they have been trained since 9/11 happened to simply obey authority. That's what all this war on terror is about. Obedience to authority. You jump when they tell you.
So many planks of the new international code, which again is the loss of rights and private property by the way, have been carried out already across different parts of the States. The word Communism is never used of course, but when you look at the war on the family, the redistribution of wealth across the world that's been coming out recently. They've been doing it for fifty years, but now they're saying it openly, the redistribution of wealth. That's your wealth, it's not the big boys at the top of course, they never do this, it's your wealth that's to be distributed across the world. And they say that by doing so you'll bring up the Third World countries, through the different trade agreements they've made with them. And through the OECD departments at the World Organization level. At the same time, you have to come down to a post-consumerist society into a service economy, which you're already in, and go beyond the service economy into a sustainable society. That means you're going down to pretty well Third World national status.
Richardson: Hey, Alan, do you happen to just off hand, off the top of your head know the Tytler cycle? The Tytler cycle, from well I wish I had it in front of me. I was hoping you would know actually. It was a man named T-y-t-l-e-r, and he came up with a cycle of how civilizations start in pretty much despotism, gets religion, gets to a point, and then goes back into dependency.
Alan: Again, even that he took from Plato; Plato went right through the different cycles of starting off as an Agricultural society, the same thing as the founders of the U.S. said. They did say that this Constitution would only really work with an Agricultural, Independent Society. And they knew that once the big cities came in, and industry came in big time and people flooded to cities, that's when the big shysters and the money game get at work, and they start to destroy the free rights of everybody else. Well, they knew that would happen. They'd already seen that happen in the U.K. and elsewhere you see, back then in the 1700s. Plato did talk about the different systems that follow each other. And he said that the founders of Italy, who were rugged, most of them were farmers. They were the toughest ones of all. They also were a citizen army. They would be the army in times of war. And they had a high code of conduct he said, that's the only time you get a high code of conduct is when the people, the militia themselves are the army. A standing army is always a problem. It's always turned on the people. But he also said that this will go into a Senatorial type of system. The Senators eventually always become corrupted, and they will try to not only for personal gain take the land off the people, in the rural areas, by the way, that's happening already under Agenda 21 and elsewhere. They just announced in Australia that they're going to burn, this was in the papers by the way, yesterday, they're going to burn people off the land, the rural lands in Australia. It's too expensive to have them in higher fire risk areas, so they're simply going to encourage them to get off and back into the cities.
Richardson: A lot of people don't know what Agenda 21 actually represents. And it's a very hard subject to really grasp. Can you explain a little bit about Agenda 21 and how it affects us all, every day, wherever we live?
Alan: You have to go into the Millennium report. That was the first report that blossomed into Agenda 21 from the United Nations. And Agenda 21 eventually got so well known by different people in the Patriot Community that on the UN's own website, and I've got it, I kept the article here, I saved it, because they always disappear. They actually were advised, all those participating in Agenda 21 were advised to change their names for different a