Alan Watt on "National Intel Report" on RBN:

"We Go Through the Abyss, Stumbling for Sight,
with the Goal in Mind, There Will Be Light"

July 11, 2008

Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - July 11, 2008 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers’ Comments)

WWW.CUTTINGTHROUGHTHEMATRIX.COM

www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu

Hi Folks, I’m Alan Watt, filling in for John Stadtmiller, on the 11th of July 2008. I’ll also be on, an hour after I finish up here, on “Cutting Through the Matrix.” I always start off my shows by advising people to go into the cuttingthroughthematrix.com website, and looking through all the many shows I’ve done in the past tying up all the loose ends of histories and organizations that control the past, the present and if they get their way they’ll pull off a brand new stunt for the New World Order that they’ve had in the making for a long time. Go into the website and you’ll find lots of histories on this particular agenda. You can also look into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts which you can download in the various tongues of Europe.

Isn’t it amazing, the speed of transition from one system to the next since 9-11 happened in 2001?  For most people in the world, who do float through their lives, they’re not conscious generally, they think that the media must be telling the truth, that circumstances outside of politicians’ control and governments’ control just happened to have set us on a path where we must lose all our freedoms in order to have security. See, the big lie is just that, because it’s your freedom that gives you your security; and I don’t think people have thought that through at all; it’s the only safeguard you have. To give you security, is freedom. When you have no freedoms you have no security because you have no rights. This technique of creating terrorism to quell the people into compliance into a new system is ancient. The ancient Roman tyrants used it all the time and standing armies were always turned upon their own people. That’s why they had a big debate about standing armies when they formed the United States; after the Revolutionary War they got round that by forming the Marine Corps, it was still a military, but technically it belonged to the Navy; that was the big mistake.

Right after 9-11 happened, every media on the planet the very next day went into action, asking the man and woman in the street, “would you give up your rights and freedoms for security?”  That doesn’t happen by chance; why was that the main question asked across the whole planet? It’s because we’ve been global for quite some time, with a shadow government, a parallel government as Professor Carroll Quigley talked about, that he knew had been on the go since the beginning of the 1900’s. It took years and years of bureaucrats back and forth to other countries to sign agreements to create the conditions necessary to bring them all in on the same anti-terrorism bills and acts and security measures, at the same time, right after 9-11. Bureaucracies do not work quickly, it takes years in preparation for them to get anything done, never mind when it takes international co-operation so that they’re all ‘on board’ and they come out at the same time with the same bills. Nothing happens by chance, nothing, and I’m going to explain more of this after this following break.

Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt, filling in for John Stadtmiller, and I think there’s quite a bunch of people gone off to some big march in Washington, I think that’s the reason John’s not here. In fact, I’m out of the loop this last few days, so I’m not sure what it’s really about and how many people are turning up at it, but I’m sure it’ll be quite some fun.

As I was saying, we have to start to get out of this linear way of thinking that we’ve been trained into, where we think that things evolve daily and politicians deal with problems that just crop up like weeds that come up through the grass as they happen, and deal with it for us. It isn’t until you go into the history books that you see that everything is literally planned way ahead of time by big foundations, big international meetings. When you go into the books of communism, where so much of this was written, and remembering too the evidence that communism was a creation of the West, it certainly was funded into existence by Western powers and Western banks and Western aid, and kept alive during its whole existence by the West; it isn’t until you go into their books, where they talked about their sciences of communism and their theories, and you find speeches by Lenin and Stalin and others. Lenin said that communism would probably last about seventy years and then it would blend with the West, and out of it would come a new system, not quite capitalist, not quite communist; it’s the new ordered socialist system.

What is socialism? Like so many things, it has different meanings to different groups, just like communism had a different meaning to the three tiers of groups in the Soviet Union. The Politburo were given the real agenda, the lower bureaucracies were given a different meaning, and the man in the street was given ‘we’re all in it together, it’s to better us all.’ That’s how things are done, and socialism is done in the same way in the West. We know for instance that those that controlled and run socialism ran it from the Fabian Society, set up by multi-millionaires such as the Astors in England, and they took on board prominent authors. Authors help sway the minds of people, that’s what writers are for; today, movies and so on have taken over, because we’re programmed through fiction. Fabian Socialism talked about the planned society; we’ve all heard of Planned Parenthood, the organization set up the Natzi and communist and eugenicist, Margaret Sanger. Well, we’re going into the planned society for the world and it’s a eugenics society, where even in the 1700’s those who were financing the industrial revolution in Europe were talking about a post-industrial revolution, where there’d be too many useless eaters and they’d have to start culling them off, either through wars or other means. They even discussed in the 1800’s, right into the 1950’s, using the needle, inoculations, ‘the needle’ they called it, to create crippling diseases and compliant societies; Bertrand Russell used that term.

Meanwhile, the mainstream media, whose job it is, being an essential arm of government control, keep people running around with trivia and things of no real import in their lives. It was decided back in the ‘60’s to bombard the public with a surrealistic media, including the news, where sports and Hollywood and celebrities would be mixed in with tragedies and wars and starvations across the world, until nothing is real anymore; it’s all mixed together in an almost fantasia, a dreamlike state. It’s hard then to come away after watching people starving somewhere and crawling around on the ground as they die, mixed in with some bimbo in Hollywood who’s just had the recent affair or latest boob implant or something like that. You don’t come away with the import of the topic; it’s mixed up with all this incredible fantasy, that’s psychological warfare which is used on the public. It was used, too, during the Vietnam era, where people would come home from work and gradually be accustomed and acclimatized to eating their dinner while watching people getting blown up and napalmed on television, until it became regular fare, as we all became desensitized.

More than that, those that planned this New World Order that was to kick off in 2001 had to – being long-term planners as they are – raise a whole generation of children up into adulthood with a different type of culture, with a different world view, with morals given to them by the state instead of the parents. They gave them the most debased society, becoming more and more and more debased with their music, their dress codes, the ‘me’ type generation, egosyntonic behaviour, because people who have no moral codes scream out for it, especially children – Hitler knew this, the Young Communists league knew this too – children who don’t have codes and rules and morals to follow will gladly come into armies where they do give them those very things. That’s why the Young Communists league and the Hitler Youth flourished as those same organizations using psychologists, who were telling their parents ‘don’t scold your children,’ etc.; that’s still used today. People who are not bonded together, there’s no binding there, there’s no bond in society, are easy prey to be manipulated, until we have a whole society where the government can literally bypass everyone around you and come right down and speak to you and no one, no family member, will stand up in their way or help you.

A generation has grown up with video games – video games, which is admitted by the military, were designed for the military to desensitize soldiers from killing. It’s not a natural thing for the average person to join the military and actually go and kill someone just like that. They found out during the American Civil War, after the biggest battles – and yes the tests and the surveys were going on even then – that in the battlefield only about fifteen percent of those who were dead on the field had actually fired their muskets. Video games took over from human targets, human paper targets. Video games were much, much better, especially when you get it into the minds of the young to act automatically as a game, and you go in and kill the enemies with no consequences, no reprisals coming back from society; and when you go into the real combat zones you act the same way – there he is, bang, he’s dead. A whole generation were raised and given an amoralistic-type culture where anything goes, they were told there are no values, values are constantly shifting according to the needs of the society of the day; it’s called moral relativism. We see the outcome everywhere in society, but these people do go into the military and do their job very well – raised on purpose for a war that would come down the road in twenty-odd years, which is here, now. That’s planning, and nothing evolves in this culture or this society by itself.

People always harp on about Adam Weishaupt, as though he was the creator of a system that started this esoteric movement towards global government and the domination of a few over the many; and nothing is further from the truth. He was only one member of one particular branch, who had a very loud mouth and took the heat for all the rest of them. He was arrogant enough, being a good little psychopath, to admit the ambitions of the organization; but he did say something very interesting, he said: Through the creation of philanthropy and foundations (in other words, what we think of as charitable institutions) they would guide the whole of society into this new system; and that’s what we have.

People think of democracy as rule by the mob; that never existed either. Democracy is chosen by those who rule the world, who really rule the world, not just govern it but rule it; democracy was chosen because the masses will always vote the way they are directed. However, within democracy, if you look into the meanings and the definition of democracy, the Western world, the Western countries will say that it’s ‘rule by the majority for the good of the many,’ it’s the most good for the most people, but they say ‘giving particular attention to minority groups.’ Within minority groups come the foundations, multi-billion dollar foundations like the Rockefeller foundation, the Carnegie foundation, the Ford foundation, the Guggenheim foundation, all of these foundations which work together and often have the same board members at the top. Back with more of this, after the following messages.

Hi Folks, I’m Alan Watt back and we’re Cutting Through the Matrix, standing in for John Stadtmiller, who’s off I think to Washington to the big march that’s on there. I’m talking about democracy and how it was set up to be a rigged game from the beginning, because you have to go into the definitions of it, where minority groups would be given certain preferences, and under those minority groups you have the big foundations – foundations which are incredibly organized with agendas set forth in their mandates, agendas that can be set forth three, four generations, five generations ago, always working towards the same goals. That’s again what Professor Carroll Quigley talked about in his book “Tragedy and Hope.” They don’t lose track of their goals.

You see, we work in a routine our whole lives long, our short little lives, we buzz through it, and it’s unthinkable for us to start something that we can’t complete in our lifetime. That’s why these big organizations are able to do what they do. They do it a different way, they put big money up, they hire people, work them, retire them and recruit new ones generation after generation and never lose sight of their goals. They can make things happen over a course of generations by introducing movements into society which alter the culture and eventually become the new culture. These big foundations all have the same agenda, although they specialize in their own little parts.

The agenda was well written about by some of the protégés set out by Professor Thomas Huxley in the 1800s. He was the grandfather of Aldous Huxley and Julian Huxley and he was the best friend of Charles Darwin. He set up what was called the Red Tie School, where certain recruits would be brought in with special gifts – gifts of writing fact into fiction in a form of predictive programming which would capture the readers, leave implanted imprints in their memories on certain topics and they would actually act out these topics throughout their lives. They would look towards this world with glee in fact; they’d want it to come into being the way it was presented and painted to them. That is predictive programming. Everybody who attended that particular school run by this man who was dedi